History of tag 0A88
Go back to the tag's page.
type |
time |
link |
changed the proof
|
2017-07-11 |
c77da5e |
Lemma in duality
Just the analogue of lemma from 57907636 for schemes
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2017-06-29 |
b0ad73c |
Notational changes only
Try to indicate the sheaf of rings we are taking R\SheafHom over in the
chapter on duality on schemes because in that chapter we do some pretty
subtle things where confusion is possible...
|
moved the statement to file duality.tex
|
2017-06-06 |
a866f45 |
Three new chapters
Titles: "Duality for Schemes", "Discriminants", "Local Cohomology"
|
changed the proof
|
2017-06-06 |
a866f45 |
Three new chapters
Titles: "Duality for Schemes", "Discriminants", "Local Cohomology"
|
changed the proof
|
2017-04-11 |
04fef69 |
New macro: \Ext
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2015-03-30 |
881f484 |
Try to make usage of RHom more uniform
|
changed the proof
|
2014-05-13 |
ee8973b |
Upper shriek transforms dualizing into dualizing
|
assigned tag 0A88
|
2014-05-10 |
9e227cd
|
Tags: Added new tags
|
created statement with label lemma-affine-duality in dualizing.tex
|
2014-05-08 |
e96773c |
A little bit more about dualizing complexes
Existence implies universally catenary and finite dimension for rings
Definition for locally Noetherian schemes... We just say it should be
affine locally a dualizing complex. This is not the most wonderful way
to do it, but it avoids talking about finite injective dimensions for
complexes of modules over a sheaf of rings.
|