History of tag 0AAC
Go back to the tag's page.
type |
time |
link |
changed the statement
|
2024-06-17 |
0930990 |
fix small typos
|
changed the statement
|
2019-09-19 |
0691693 |
Fix out of date assertion
The lemma that was referred to has changed...
|
changed the statement
|
2017-10-09 |
5cd0462 |
blow-ups, blow ups, and blowups
THis is made difficult because I can 'blow up' something
Thanks to Antoine Chambert-Loir
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/01OF#comment-2823
|
moved the statement to file duality.tex
|
2017-06-06 |
a866f45 |
Three new chapters
Titles: "Duality for Schemes", "Discriminants", "Local Cohomology"
|
changed the statement
|
2015-08-27 |
902dc09 |
Move two lemmas and generalize one
Relative dualizing complex for P(E)
|
changed the statement
|
2015-04-02 |
6b240e8 |
The notation "twisted inverse image" was used for the wrong functor
Now our terminology agrees with the one from Lipman's notes
Thanks to Alice Rizzardo for pointing this out
|
changed the statement
|
2015-03-30 |
cbe10b9 |
Small changes to dualizing.tex
|
changed the statement
|
2014-12-12 |
4a23ea5 |
Move a lemma in dualizing.tex
|
assigned tag 0AAC
|
2014-05-14 |
7697480
|
Tags: Added new tags
|
created statement with label example-base-change-wrong in dualizing.tex
|
2014-05-14 |
38e0d41 |
Put the results on proper and flat morphisms in its own section
Also: An example to show that base change cannot hold in general
(of course you may well say).
|