History of tag 0AE5
Go back to the tag's page.
| type |
time |
link |
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2021-02-11 |
4f233b2 |
Final cleanup restricted
It even got a new chapter name and introduction
|
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2015-06-15 |
683f4c9 |
Finish resolution of surfaces
Decided to split the chapter into two:
(a) for schemes following very closely Artin's write-up
(b) for algebraic spaces, try to reduce everything as
much as possible from the case of schemes...
Is it really not possible to just work with ASs?
|
|
changed the label to lemma-Noetherian-local-ring
|
2014-10-20 |
56aed2b |
Upgrade results on modification using recent results
|
|
moved the statement to file restricted.tex
|
2014-10-20 |
56aed2b |
Upgrade results on modification using recent results
|
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2014-10-20 |
56aed2b |
Upgrade results on modification using recent results
|
|
changed the proof
|
2014-07-22 |
8cbbd1c |
Fix typos
|
|
changed the proof
|
2014-07-15 |
d8e00c5 |
Move material on formal glueing to spaces-pushouts.tex
|
|
changed the proof
|
2014-06-25 |
bfddc28 |
Equivalence of modifications for G-rings
Finally! As Jason pointed out in
http://math.columbia.edu/~dejong/wordpress/?p=3692&cpage=1#comment-1120289
you can deduce this result from Artin's results on modifications of
algebraic spaces. In fact, it seems likely that his arguments are very
close to those given here, but I haven't checked this.
|
|
changed the statement
|
2014-06-17 |
1706ca0 |
Fix statements of two future lemmas in resolve.tex
|
|
assigned tag 0AE5
|
2014-06-05 |
db48fc0
|
Tags: Added new tags
|
|
assigned tag 0AE5
|
2014-06-05 |
07b83c2
|
Revert "Tags: Added new tags"
This reverts commit 515802d4c5e34f6abc8561c7075500b916a686a4.
Reason: We should never add tags to a development branch!
|
|
assigned tag 0AE5
|
2014-06-05 |
515802d
|
Tags: Added new tags
|
|
created statement with label lemma-G-ring in resolve.tex
|
2014-06-03 |
4c8c0e4 |
Example of a modification which is not a scheme
Thanks to Bob Friedman for a discussion
|