The Stacks project

15.67 Spectral sequences for Ext

In this section we collect various spectral sequences that come up when considering the Ext functors. For any pair of objects $L$, $K$ of the derived category $D(R)$ of a ring $R$ we denote

\[ \mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits ^ n_ R(L, K) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(R)}(L, K[n]) \]

according to our general conventions in Derived Categories, Section 13.27.

For $M$ an $R$-module and $K \in D^+(R)$ there is a spectral sequence
\begin{equation} \label{more-algebra-equation-first-ss-ext} E_2^{i, j} = \mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits _ R^ i(M, H^ j(K)) \Rightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits _ R^{i + j}(M, K) \end{equation}

and if $K$ is represented by the bounded below complex $K^\bullet $ of $R$-modules there is a spectral sequence
\begin{equation} \label{more-algebra-equation-second-ss-ext} E_1^{i, j} = \mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits _ R^ j(M, K^ i) \Rightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits _ R^{i + j}(M, K) \end{equation}

These spectral sequences come from applying Derived Categories, Lemma 13.21.3 to the functor $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(M, -)$.

Comments (3)

Comment #4834 by Weixiao Lu on

It seems that this section has not been finished yet?

Comment #5133 by on

Everybody is free to contribute

Comment #5141 by on

@#4834: OK, I have added a reference to how to construct these spectral sequences.

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0AVG. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.