The Stacks project

Lemma 43.9.1. Let $X$ be a variety. Let $W \subset X$ be a subvariety of dimension $k + 1$. Let $f \in \mathbf{C}(W)^*$ be a nonzero rational function on $W$. Then $\text{div}_ W(f)$ is rationally equivalent to zero on $X$. Conversely, these principal divisors generate the abelian group of cycles rationally equivalent to zero on $X$.

Proof. The first assertion follows from Chow Homology, Lemma 42.18.2. More precisely, let $W' \subset X \times \mathbf{P}^1$ be the closure of the graph of $f$. Then $\text{div}_ W(f) = [W'_0]_ k - [W'_\infty ]$ in $Z_ k(W) \subset Z_ k(X)$, see part (6) of Chow Homology, Lemma 42.18.2.

For the second, let $W' \subset X \times \mathbf{P}^1$ be a closed subvariety of dimension $k + 1$ which dominates $\mathbf{P}^1$. We will show that $[W'_0]_ k - [W'_\infty ]_ k$ is a principal divisor which will finish the proof. Let $W \subset X$ be the image of $W'$ under the projection to $X$. Then $W \subset X$ is a closed subvariety and $W' \to W$ is proper and dominant with fibres of dimension $0$ or $1$. If $\dim (W) = k$, then $W' = W \times \mathbf{P}^1$ and we see that $[W'_0]_ k - [W'_\infty ]_ k = [W] - [W] = 0$. If $\dim (W) = k + 1$, then $W' \to W$ is generically finite1. Let $f$ denote the projection $W' \to \mathbf{P}^1$ viewed as an element of $\mathbf{C}(W')^*$. Let $g = \text{Nm}(f) \in \mathbf{C}(W)^*$ be the norm. By Chow Homology, Lemma 42.18.1 we have

\[ \text{div}_ W(g) = \text{pr}_{X, *}\text{div}_{W'}(f) \]

Since $\text{div}_{W'}(f) = [W'_0]_ k - [W'_\infty ]_ k$ by Chow Homology, Lemma 42.18.2 the proof is complete. $\square$

[1] If $W' \to W$ is birational, then the result follows from Chow Homology, Lemma 42.18.2. Our task is to show that even if $W' \to W$ has degree $> 1$ the basic rational equivalence $[W'_0]_ k \sim _{rat} [W'_\infty ]_ k$ comes from a principal divisor on a subvariety of $X$.

Comments (3)

Comment #6776 by Morten on

Why is the map generically finite? Could not be a trivial family like ?

Comment #6777 by on

Ha! Yes, this could happen. Of course, in that case is the zero cycle. I will fix this the next time I go through all the comments.

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 43.9: Rational equivalence and rational functions

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0AZI. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.