Lemma 33.19.1. Let f : X \to Y be locally of finite type. Let x \in X be a point with image y \in Y such that \mathcal{O}_{Y, y} is Noetherian of dimension \leq 1. Let d \geq 0 be an integer such that for every generic point \eta of an irreducible component of X which contains x, we have \dim _\eta (X_{f(\eta )}) = d. Then \dim _ x(X_ y) = d.
Proof. Recall that \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}) is the set of points of Y specializing to y, see Schemes, Lemma 26.13.2. Thus we may replace Y by \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}) and assume Y = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B) where B is a Noetherian local ring of dimension \leq 1 and y is the closed point. We may also replace X by an affine neighbourhood of x.
Let X = \bigcup X_ i be the irreducible components of X viewed as reduced closed subschemes. If we can show each fibre X_{i, y} has dimension d, then X_ y = \bigcup X_{i, y} has dimension d as well. Thus we may assume X is an integral scheme.
If X \to Y maps the generic point \eta of X to y, then X is a scheme over \kappa (y) and the result is true by assumption. Assume that X maps \eta to a point \xi \in Y corresponding to a minimal prime \mathfrak q of B different from \mathfrak m_ B. We obtain a factorization X \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B/\mathfrak q) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B). By the dimension formula (Morphisms, Lemma 29.52.1) we have
We have \dim (B/\mathfrak q) = 1. We have \text{trdeg}_{\kappa (\mathfrak q)}(R(X)) = d by our assumption that \dim _\eta (X_\xi ) = d, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.28.1. Since \mathcal{O}_{X, x} \to \mathcal{O}_{X_ s, x} has a kernel (as \eta \mapsto \xi \not= y) and since \mathcal{O}_{X, x} is a Noetherian domain we see that \dim (\mathcal{O}_{X, x}) > \dim (\mathcal{O}_{X_ y, x}). We conclude that
(Morphisms, Lemma 29.28.1). On the other hand, we have \dim _ x(X_ s) \geq \dim _\eta (X_{f(\eta )}) = d by Morphisms, Lemma 29.28.4. \square
Comments (0)