Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

The Stacks project

History of tag 0B88

Go back to the tag's page.

type time link
changed the statement 2022-04-29 a0696ed
are -> is

THanks to Laurent Moret-Bailly
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0B88#comment-6994
changed the proof 2022-01-23 9cee969
Try to use L/K notation for field extensions

We could also try to consistenly use "field extension" and not just
"extension" and consistently use "ring extension", etc.
changed the statement and the proof 2015-05-05 a1e196c
Upgrade discussion about field extension and schematic locus
assigned tag 0B88 2015-04-22 e1ef4ca
Tags: Added new tags
changed the proof 2015-04-21 8e0d5ce
Separated grp alg spaces over infinite fields are schemes

The results in this commit beg the following question: Can there be an
algebraic space X over a finite field k such that X_{k(t)} is a scheme,
but X is not a scheme? Which leads to the following similar question:
Can there be a nonrepresentable algebraic space X over k such that both
X_{k'} and X_{k''} are schemes, where k' and k'' are the extensions of
degree 2 and 3 of k?

Weird! Email me if you have an answer...
created statement with label lemma-scheme-over-algebraic-closure-enough-affines in spaces-over-fields.tex 2015-04-21 4316fa4
Change of base field and schematic locus

Fun