Lemma 20.25.5. Let X be a topological space. Let \mathcal{O}' \to \mathcal{O} be a surjection of sheaves of rings whose kernel \mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}' has square zero. Then M = H^1(X, \mathcal{I}) is a R = H^0(X, \mathcal{O})-module and the boundary map \partial : R \to M associated to the short exact sequence
0 \to \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{O}' \to \mathcal{O} \to 0
is a derivation (Algebra, Definition 10.131.1).
Proof.
The map \mathcal{O}' \to \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits (\mathcal{I}, \mathcal{I}) factors through \mathcal{O} as \mathcal{I} \cdot \mathcal{I} = 0 by assumption. Hence \mathcal{I} is a sheaf of \mathcal{O}-modules and this defines the R-module structure on M. The boundary map is additive hence it suffices to prove the Leibniz rule. Let f \in R. Choose an open covering \mathcal{U} : X = \bigcup U_ i such that there exist f_ i \in \mathcal{O}'(U_ i) lifting f|_{U_ i} \in \mathcal{O}(U_ i). Observe that f_ i - f_ j is an element of \mathcal{I}(U_ i \cap U_ j). Then \partial (f) corresponds to the Čech cohomology class of the 1-cocycle \alpha with \alpha _{i_0i_1} = f_{i_0} - f_{i_1}. (Observe that by Lemma 20.11.3 the first Čech cohomology group with respect to \mathcal{U} is a submodule of M.) Next, let g \in R be a second element and assume (after possibly refining the open covering) that g_ i \in \mathcal{O}'(U_ i) lifts g|_{U_ i} \in \mathcal{O}(U_ i). Then we see that \partial (g) is given by the cocycle \beta with \beta _{i_0i_1} = g_{i_0} - g_{i_1}. Since f_ ig_ i \in \mathcal{O}'(U_ i) lifts fg|_{U_ i} we see that \partial (fg) is given by the cocycle \gamma with
\gamma _{i_0i_1} = f_{i_0}g_{i_0} - f_{i_1}g_{i_1} = (f_{i_0} - f_{i_1})g_{i_0} + f_{i_1}(g_{i_0} - g_{i_1}) = \alpha _{i_0i_1}g + f\beta _{i_0i_1}
by our definition of the \mathcal{O}-module structure on \mathcal{I}. This proves the Leibniz rule and the proof is complete.
\square
Comments (0)
There are also: