Loading web-font TeX/Math/Italic

The Stacks project

Lemma 20.25.5. Let X be a topological space. Let \mathcal{O}' \to \mathcal{O} be a surjection of sheaves of rings whose kernel \mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}' has square zero. Then M = H^1(X, \mathcal{I}) is a R = H^0(X, \mathcal{O})-module and the boundary map \partial : R \to M associated to the short exact sequence

0 \to \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{O}' \to \mathcal{O} \to 0

is a derivation (Algebra, Definition 10.131.1).

Proof. The map \mathcal{O}' \to \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits (\mathcal{I}, \mathcal{I}) factors through \mathcal{O} as \mathcal{I} \cdot \mathcal{I} = 0 by assumption. Hence \mathcal{I} is a sheaf of \mathcal{O}-modules and this defines the R-module structure on M. The boundary map is additive hence it suffices to prove the Leibniz rule. Let f \in R. Choose an open covering \mathcal{U} : X = \bigcup U_ i such that there exist f_ i \in \mathcal{O}'(U_ i) lifting f|_{U_ i} \in \mathcal{O}(U_ i). Observe that f_ i - f_ j is an element of \mathcal{I}(U_ i \cap U_ j). Then \partial (f) corresponds to the Čech cohomology class of the 1-cocycle \alpha with \alpha _{i_0i_1} = f_{i_0} - f_{i_1}. (Observe that by Lemma 20.11.3 the first Čech cohomology group with respect to \mathcal{U} is a submodule of M.) Next, let g \in R be a second element and assume (after possibly refining the open covering) that g_ i \in \mathcal{O}'(U_ i) lifts g|_{U_ i} \in \mathcal{O}(U_ i). Then we see that \partial (g) is given by the cocycle \beta with \beta _{i_0i_1} = g_{i_0} - g_{i_1}. Since f_ ig_ i \in \mathcal{O}'(U_ i) lifts fg|_{U_ i} we see that \partial (fg) is given by the cocycle \gamma with

\gamma _{i_0i_1} = f_{i_0}g_{i_0} - f_{i_1}g_{i_1} = (f_{i_0} - f_{i_1})g_{i_0} + f_{i_1}(g_{i_0} - g_{i_1}) = \alpha _{i_0i_1}g + f\beta _{i_0i_1}

by our definition of the \mathcal{O}-module structure on \mathcal{I}. This proves the Leibniz rule and the proof is complete. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 6 comment(s) on Section 20.25: Čech cohomology of complexes

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.