Lemma 54.14.3. Let $(A, \mathfrak m, \kappa )$ be a Noetherian local ring. Assume $A$ is normal and has dimension $2$. If $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ has a resolution of singularities, then $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ has a resolution by normalized blowups.

**Proof.**
By Lemma 54.13.3 the completion $A^\wedge $ of $A$ is normal. By Lemma 54.11.2 we see that $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A^\wedge )$ has a resolution. By Lemma 54.11.7 any sequence $Y_ n \to Y_{n - 1} \to \ldots \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A^\wedge )$ of normalized blowups of comes from a sequence of normalized blowups $X_ n \to \ldots \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$. Moreover if $Y_ n$ is regular, then $X_ n$ is regular by Lemma 54.11.2. Thus it suffices to prove the lemma in case $A$ is complete.

Assume in addition $A$ is a complete. We will use that $A$ is Nagata (Algebra, Proposition 10.162.16), excellent (More on Algebra, Proposition 15.52.3), and has a dualizing complex (Dualizing Complexes, Lemma 47.22.4). Moreover, the same is true for any ring essentially of finite type over $A$. If $B$ is a excellent local normal domain, then the completion $B^\wedge $ is normal (as $B \to B^\wedge $ is regular and More on Algebra, Lemma 15.42.2 applies). We will use this without further mention in the rest of the proof.

Let $X \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ be a resolution of singularities. Choose a sequence of normalized blowing ups

dominating $X$ (Lemma 54.5.3). The morphism $Y_ n \to X$ is an isomorphism away from finitely many points of $X$. Hence we can apply Lemma 54.4.2 to find a sequence of blowing ups

in closed points such that $X_ m$ dominates $Y_ n$. Diagram

To prove the lemma it suffices to show that a finite number of normalized blowups of $Y_ n$ produce a regular scheme. By our diagram above we see that $Y_ n$ has a resolution (namely $X_ m$). As $Y_ n$ is a normal surface this implies that $Y_ n$ has at most finitely many singularities $y_1, \ldots , y_ t$ (because $X_ m \to Y_ n$ is an isomorphism away from the fibres of dimension $1$, see Varieties, Lemma 33.17.3).

Let $x_ a \in X$ be the image of $y_ a$. Then $\mathcal{O}_{X, x_ a}$ is regular and hence defines a rational singularity (Lemma 54.8.7). Apply Lemma 54.8.4 to $\mathcal{O}_{X, x_ a} \to \mathcal{O}_{Y_ n, y_ a}$ to see that $\mathcal{O}_{Y_ n, y_ a}$ defines a rational singularity. By Lemma 54.9.8 there exists a finite sequence of blowups in singular closed points

such that $Y_{a, n_ a}$ is Gorenstein, i.e., has an invertible dualizing module. By (the essentially trivial) Lemma 54.6.4 with $n' = \sum n_ a$ these sequences correspond to a sequence of blowups

such that $Y_{n + n'}$ is normal and the local rings of $Y_{n + n'}$ are Gorenstein. Using the references given above we can dominate $Y_{n + n'}$ by a sequence of blowups $X_{m + m'} \to \ldots \to X_ m$ dominating $Y_{n + n'}$ as in the following

Thus again $Y_{n + n'}$ has a finite number of singular points $y'_1, \ldots , y'_ s$, but this time the singularities are rational double points, more precisely, the local rings $\mathcal{O}_{Y_{n + n'}, y'_ b}$ are as in Lemma 54.12.3. Arguing exactly as above we conclude that the lemma is true. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)