Lemma 47.9.6. Let A be a ring and let I, J \subset A be finitely generated ideals. Set Z = V(I) and Y = V(J). Then Z \cap Y = V(I + J) and R\Gamma _ Y \circ R\Gamma _ Z = R\Gamma _{Y \cap Z} as functors D(A) \to D_{(I + J)^\infty \text{-torsion}}(A). For K \in D^+(A) there is a spectral sequence
E_2^{p, q} = H^ p_ Y(H^ q_ Z(K)) \Rightarrow H^{p + q}_{Y \cap Z}(K)
as in Derived Categories, Lemma 13.22.2.
Proof.
There is a bit of abuse of notation in the lemma as strictly speaking we cannot compose R\Gamma _ Y and R\Gamma _ Z. The meaning of the statement is simply that we are composing R\Gamma _ Z with the inclusion D_{I^\infty \text{-torsion}}(A) \to D(A) and then with R\Gamma _ Y. Then the equality R\Gamma _ Y \circ R\Gamma _ Z = R\Gamma _{Y \cap Z} follows from the fact that
D_{I^\infty \text{-torsion}}(A) \to D(A) \xrightarrow {R\Gamma _ Y} D_{(I + J)^\infty \text{-torsion}}(A)
is right adjoint to the inclusion D_{(I + J)^\infty \text{-torsion}}(A) \to D_{I^\infty \text{-torsion}}(A). Alternatively one can prove the formula using Lemma 47.9.1 and the fact that the tensor product of extended Čech complexes on f_1, \ldots , f_ r and g_1, \ldots , g_ m is the extended Čech complex on f_1, \ldots , f_ n. g_1, \ldots , g_ m. The final assertion follows from this and the cited lemma.
\square
Comments (3)
Comment #3597 by Kestutis Cesnavicius on
Comment #3599 by Kestutis Cesnavicius on
Comment #3714 by Johan on
There are also: