The Stacks project

Remark 53.4.3. Let $X$ be a proper scheme of dimension $\leq 1$ over a field $k$. Let $\omega _ X^\bullet $ and $\omega _ X$ be as in Lemma 53.4.1. If $\mathcal{E}$ is a finite locally free $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module with dual $\mathcal{E}^\vee $ then we have canonical isomorphisms

\[ \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ k(H^{-i}(X, \mathcal{E}), k) = H^ i(X, \mathcal{E}^\vee \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X}^\mathbf {L} \omega _ X^\bullet ) \]

This follows from the lemma and Cohomology, Lemma 20.48.5. If $X$ is Cohen-Macaulay and equidimensional of dimension $1$, then we have canonical isomorphisms

\[ \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ k(H^{-i}(X, \mathcal{E}), k) = H^{1 + i}(X, \mathcal{E}^\vee \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \omega _ X) \]

by Lemma 53.4.2. In particular if $\mathcal{L}$ is an invertible $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module, then we have

\[ \dim _ k H^0(X, \mathcal{L}) = \dim _ k H^1(X, \mathcal{L}^{\otimes -1} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \omega _ X) \]


\[ \dim _ k H^1(X, \mathcal{L}) = \dim _ k H^0(X, \mathcal{L}^{\otimes -1} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \omega _ X) \]

Comments (2)

Comment #7163 by Xuande Liu on

I think the second equation should be .

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0BS4. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.