Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 33.41.2. Let X be a reduced Nagata scheme of dimension 1. Let \nu : X^\nu \to X be the normalization. Let x \in X denote a closed point. Then

  1. \nu : X^\nu \to X is finite, surjective, and birational,

  2. \mathcal{O}_ X \subset \nu _*\mathcal{O}_{X^\nu } and \nu _*\mathcal{O}_{X^\nu }/\mathcal{O}_ X is a direct sum of skyscraper sheaves \mathcal{Q}_ x in the singular points x of X,

  3. A' = (\nu _*\mathcal{O}_{X^\nu })_ x is the integral closure of A = \mathcal{O}_{X, x} in its total ring of fractions,

  4. \mathcal{Q}_ x = A'/A has finite length equal to the \delta -invariant of X at x,

  5. A' is a semi-local ring which is a finite product of Dedekind domains,

  6. A^\wedge is a reduced Noetherian complete local ring of dimension 1,

  7. (A')^\wedge is the integral closure of A^\wedge in its total ring of fractions,

  8. (A')^\wedge is a finite product of complete discrete valuation rings, and

  9. A'/A \cong (A')^\wedge /A^\wedge .

Proof. We may and will use all the results of Lemma 33.41.1. Finiteness of \nu follows from Morphisms, Lemma 29.54.11. Since X is reduced, Nagata, of dimension 1, we see that the regular locus is a dense open U \subset X by More on Algebra, Proposition 15.48.7. Since a regular scheme is normal, this shows that \nu is an isomorphism over U. Since \dim (X) \leq 1 this implies that \nu is not an isomorphism over a discrete set of closed points x \in X. In particular we see that we have a short exact sequence

0 \to \mathcal{O}_ X \to \nu _*\mathcal{O}_{X^\nu } \to \bigoplus \nolimits _{x \in X \setminus U} \mathcal{Q}_ x \to 0

As we have the description of the stalks of \nu _*\mathcal{O}_{X^\nu } by Lemma 33.41.1, we conclude that Q_ x = A'/A indeed has length equal to the \delta -invariant of X at x. Note that Q_ x \not= 0 exactly when x is a singular point for example by Lemma 33.39.4. The description of A' as a product of semi-local Dedekind domains follows from Lemma 33.41.1 as well. The relationship between A, A', and (A')^\wedge we have see in Lemma 33.39.5 (and its proof). \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.