Proof.
Recall that there exists an isomorphism \mathbf{P}^1_ k \to E such that the normal sheaf of E in X pulls back to \mathcal{O}(-1). Then H^0(E, \mathcal{O}_ E) = k. We will denote \mathcal{O}_ n(iE) the restriction of the invertible sheaf \mathcal{O}_ X(iE) to E_ n for all n \geq 1 and i \in \mathbf{Z}. Recall that \mathcal{O}_ X(-nE) is the ideal sheaf of E_ n. Hence for d \geq 0 we obtain a short exact sequence
0 \to \mathcal{O}_ E(-(d + n)E) \to \mathcal{O}_{n + 1}(-dE) \to \mathcal{O}_ n(-dE) \to 0
Since \mathcal{O}_ E(-(d + n)E) = \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^1_ k}(d + n) the first cohomology group vanishes for all d \geq 0 and n \geq 1. We conclude that the transition maps of the system H^0(E_ n, \mathcal{O}_ n(-dE)) are surjective. For d = 0 we get an inverse system of surjections of rings such that the kernel of each transition map is a nilpotent ideal. Hence A = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits H^0(E_ n, \mathcal{O}_ n) is a local ring with residue field k and maximal ideal
\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(H^0(E_ n, \mathcal{O}_ n) \to H^0(E, \mathcal{O}_ E)) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits H^0(E_ n, \mathcal{O}_ n(-E))
Pick x, y in this kernel mapping to a k-basis of H^0(E, \mathcal{O}_ E(-E)) = H^0(\mathbf{P}^1_ k, \mathcal{O}(1)). Then x^ d, x^{d - 1}y, \ldots , y^ d are elements of \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits H^0(E_ n, \mathcal{O}_ n(-dE)) which map to a basis of H^0(E, \mathcal{O}_ E(-dE)) = H^0(\mathbf{P}^1_ k, \mathcal{O}(d)). In this way we see that A is separated and complete with respect to the linear topology defined by the kernels
I_ n = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(A \longrightarrow H^0(E_ n, \mathcal{O}_ n))
We have x, y \in I_1, I_ d I_{d'} \subset I_{d + d'} and I_ d/I_{d + 1} is a free k-module on x^ d, x^{d - 1}y, \ldots , y^ d. We will show that I_ d = (x, y)^ d. Namely, if z_ e \in I_ e with e \geq d, then we can write
z_ e = a_{e, 0} x^ d + a_{e, 1} x^{d - 1}y + \ldots + a_{e, d}y^ d + z_{e + 1}
where a_{e, j} \in (x, y)^{e - d} and z_{e + 1} \in I_{e + 1} by our description of I_ d/I_{d + 1}. Thus starting with some z = z_ d \in I_ d we can do this inductively
z = \sum \nolimits _{e \geq d} \sum \nolimits _ j a_{e, j} x^{d - j} y^ j
with some a_{e, j} \in (x, y)^{e - d}. Then a_ j = \sum _{e \geq d} a_{e, j} exists (by completeness and the fact that a_{e, j} \in I_{e - d}) and we have z = \sum a_{e, j} x^{d - j} y^ j. Hence I_ d = (x, y)^ d. Thus A is (x, y)-adically complete. Then A is Noetherian by Algebra, Lemma 10.97.5. It is clear that the dimension is 2 by the description of (x, y)^ d/(x, y)^{d + 1} and Algebra, Proposition 10.60.9. Since the maximal ideal is generated by two elements it is regular.
\square
Comments (0)