Proof.
Both cases follow from Lemma 54.16.8 using standard results on ample invertible modules and (quasi-)projective morphisms.
Proof of (1). Projectivity of f means that f is proper and there exists an f-ample invertible module \mathcal{L}, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.43.13 and Definition 29.40.1. Let U \subset S be an affine open containing the image of E. By Lemma 54.16.8 there exists a contraction c : f^{-1}(U) \to V' of E and an ample invertible module \mathcal{N}' on V' whose pullback to f^{-1}(U) is equal to \mathcal{L}(nE)|_{f^{-1}(U)}. Let v \in V' be the closed point such that c is the blowing up of v. Then we can glue V' and X \setminus E along f^{-1}(U) \setminus E = V' \setminus \{ v\} to get a scheme X' over S. The morphisms c and \text{id}_{X \setminus E} glue to a morphism b : X \to X' which is the contraction of E. The inverse image of U in X' is proper over U. On the other hand, the restriction of X' \to S to the complement of the image of v in S is isomorphic to the restriction of X \to S to that open. Hence X' \to S is proper (as being proper is local on the base by Morphisms, Lemma 29.41.3). Finally, \mathcal{N}' and \mathcal{L}|_{X \setminus E} restrict to isomorphic invertible modules over f^{-1}(U) \setminus E = V' \setminus \{ v\} and hence glue to an invertible module \mathcal{L}' over X'. The restriction of \mathcal{L}' to the inverse image of U in X' is ample because this is true for \mathcal{N}'. For affine opens of S avoiding the image of v, we see that the same is true because it holds for \mathcal{L}. Thus \mathcal{L}' is (X' \to S)-relatively ample by Morphisms, Lemma 29.37.4 and (1) is proved.
Proof of (2). We can write X as an open subscheme of a scheme \overline{X} projective over S by Morphisms, Lemma 29.43.12. By (1) there is a contraction b : \overline{X} \to \overline{X}' and \overline{X}' is projective over S. Then we let X' \subset \overline{X} be the image of X \to \overline{X}'; this is an open as b is an isomorphism away from E. Then X \to X' is the desired contraction. Note that X' is quasi-projective over S as it has an S-relatively ample invertible module by the construction in the proof of part (1).
\square
Comments (2)
Comment #7907 by Laurent Moret-Bailly on
Comment #8165 by Aise Johan de Jong on