Lemma 39.25.2. Let $X \to Y$ be a surjective finite locally free morphism. Let $V$ be a scheme over $X$ such that one of the following holds

1. $V \to X$ is projective,

2. $V \to X$ is quasi-projective,

3. there exists an ample invertible sheaf on $V$,

4. there exists an $X$-ample invertible sheaf on $V$,

5. there exists an $X$-very ample invertible sheaf on $V$.

Then any descent datum on $V/X/Y$ is effective.

Proof. We check the condition in Lemma 39.25.1. Let $y \in Y$ and $v_1, \ldots , v_ d \in V$ points over $y$. Case (1) is a special case of (2), see Morphisms, Lemma 29.43.10. Case (2) is a special case of (4), see Morphisms, Definition 29.40.1. If there exists an ample invertible sheaf on $V$, then there exists an affine open containing $v_1, \ldots , v_ d$ by Properties, Lemma 28.29.5. Thus (3) is true. In cases (4) and (5) it is harmless to replace $Y$ by an affine open neighbourhood of $y$. Then $X$ is affine too. In case (4) we see that $V$ has an ample invertible sheaf by Morphisms, Definition 29.37.1 and the result follows from case (3). In case (5) we can replace $V$ by a quasi-compact open containing $v_1, \ldots , v_ d$ and we reduce to case (4) by Morphisms, Lemma 29.38.2. $\square$

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0CCJ. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.