The Stacks project

Lemma 101.27.7. Let $f : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y}$ be a morphism of algebraic stacks with diagonal $\Delta : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} \mathcal{X}$. If $f$ is locally of finite type then $\Delta $ is locally of finite presentation. If $f$ is quasi-separated and locally of finite type, then $\Delta $ is of finite presentation.

Proof. Note that $\Delta $ is a morphism over $\mathcal{X}$ (via the second projection). If $f$ is locally of finite type, then $\mathcal{X}$ is of finite presentation over $\mathcal{X}$ and $\text{pr}_2 : \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{X}$ is locally of finite type by Lemma 101.17.3. Thus the first statement holds by Lemma 101.27.6. The second statement follows from the first and the definitions (because $f$ being quasi-separated means by definition that $\Delta _ f$ is quasi-compact and quasi-separated). $\square$

Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 101.27: Morphisms of finite presentation

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0CMG. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.