Processing math: 0%

The Stacks project

Lemma 15.36.5 (Open mapping lemma). Let u : N \to M be a continuous map of linearly topologized abelian groups. Assume that N is complete, M separated, and N has a countable fundamental system of neighbourhoods of 0. Then exactly one of the following holds

  1. u is open, or

  2. for some open subgroup N' \subset N the image u(N') is nowhere dense in M.

Proof. Let N_ n, n \in \mathbf{N} be a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of 0. We may assume that N_{n + 1} \subset N_ n. If (2) does not hold, then the closure M_ n of u(N_ n) is an open subgroup for n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots . Since u is continuous, we see that M_ n, n \in \mathbf{N} must be a fundamental system of open neighbourhoods of 0 in M. Also, since M_ n is the closure of u(N_ n) we see that

u(N_ n) + M_{n + 1} = M_ n

for all n \geq 1. Pick x_1 \in M_1. Then we can inductively choose y_ i \in N_ i and x_{i + 1} \in M_{i + 1} such that

u(y_ i) + x_{i + 1} = x_ i

The element y = y_1 + y_2 + y_3 + \ldots of N exists because N is complete. Whereupon we see that x = u(y) because M is separated. Thus M_1 = u(N_1). In exactly the same way the reader shows that M_ i = u(N_ i) for all i \geq 2 and we see that u is open. \square


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0CQW. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.