The Stacks project

Lemma 99.13.2. The diagonal

\[ \Delta : \mathcal{S}\! \mathit{paces}'_{fp, flat, proper} \longrightarrow \mathcal{S}\! \mathit{paces}'_{fp, flat, proper} \times \mathcal{S}\! \mathit{paces}'_{fp, flat, proper} \]

is representable by algebraic spaces.

Proof. We will use criterion (2) of Algebraic Stacks, Lemma 94.10.11. Let $S$ be a scheme and let $X$ and $Y$ be algebraic spaces of finite presentation over $S$, flat over $S$, and proper over $S$. We have to show that the functor

\[ \mathit{Isom}_ S(X, Y) : (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} \longrightarrow \textit{Sets}, \quad T \longmapsto \{ f : X_ T \to Y_ T \text{ isomorphism}\} \]

is an algebraic space. An elementary argument shows that $\mathit{Isom}_ S(X, Y)$ sits in a fibre product

\[ \xymatrix{ \mathit{Isom}_ S(X, Y) \ar[r] \ar[d] & S \ar[d]_{(\text{id}, \text{id})} \\ \mathit{Mor}_ S(X, Y) \times \mathit{Mor}_ S(Y, X) \ar[r] & \mathit{Mor}_ S(X, X) \times \mathit{Mor}_ S(Y, Y) } \]

The bottom arrow sends $(\varphi , \psi )$ to $(\psi \circ \varphi , \varphi \circ \psi )$. By Proposition 99.12.3 the functors on the bottom row are algebraic spaces over $S$. Hence the result follows from the fact that the category of algebraic spaces over $S$ has fibre products. $\square$


Comments (2)

Comment #2327 by Matthieu Romagny on

In the statement of the lemma, the word "is" is missing before the word "representable".


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0D1F. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.