Loading [MathJax]/jax/element/mml/optable/GeneralPunctuation.js

The Stacks project

Lemma 10.109.11. Let R be a ring. Suppose we have a module M = \bigcup _{e \in E} M_ e where the M_ e are submodules well-ordered by inclusion. Assume the quotients M_ e/\bigcup \nolimits _{e' < e} M_{e'} have projective dimension \leq n. Then M has projective dimension \leq n.

Proof. We will prove this by induction on n.

Base case: n = 0. Then P_ e = M_ e/\bigcup _{e' < e} M_{e'} is projective. Thus we may choose a section P_ e \to M_ e of the projection M_ e \to P_ e. We claim that the induced map \psi : \bigoplus _{e \in E} P_ e \to M is an isomorphism. Namely, if x = \sum x_ e \in \bigoplus P_ e is nonzero, then we let e_{max} be maximal such that x_{e_{max}} is nonzero and we conclude that y = \psi (x) = \psi (\sum x_ e) is nonzero because y \in M_{e_{max}} has nonzero image x_{e_{max}} in P_{e_{max}}. On the other hand, let y \in M. Then y \in M_ e for some e. We show that y \in \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\psi ) by transfinite induction on e. Let x_ e \in P_ e be the image of y. Then y - \psi (x_ e) \in \bigcup _{e' < e} M_{e'}. By induction hypothesis we conclude that y - \psi (x_ e) \in \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\psi ) hence y \in \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\psi ). Thus the claim is true and \psi is an isomorphism. We conclude that M is projective as a direct sum of projectives, see Lemma 10.77.4.

If n > 0, then for e \in E we denote F_ e the free R-module on the set of elements of M_ e. Then we have a system of short exact sequences

0 \to K_ e \to F_ e \to M_ e \to 0

over the well-ordered set E. Note that the transition maps F_{e'} \to F_ e and K_{e'} \to K_ e are injective too. Set F = \bigcup F_ e and K = \bigcup K_ e. Then

0 \to K_ e/\bigcup \nolimits _{e' < e} K_{e'} \to F_ e/\bigcup \nolimits _{e' < e} F_{e'} \to M_ e/\bigcup \nolimits _{e' < e} M_{e'} \to 0

is a short exact sequence of R-modules too and F_ e/\bigcup _{e' < e} F_{e'} is the free R-module on the set of elements in M_ e which are not contained in \bigcup _{e' < e} M_{e'}. Hence by Lemma 10.109.9 we see that the projective dimension of K_ e/\bigcup _{e' < e} K_{e'} is at most n - 1. By induction we conclude that K has projective dimension at most n - 1. Whence M has projective dimension at most n and we win. \square


Comments (6)

Comment #2977 by Dario Weißmann on

Maybe it should be mentioned in the lemma that we assume for ?

Comment #3101 by on

OK, I reformulated the lemma. Can you take a look here to see if you think it is better? Maybe it is worse, but I think it is more precise without being longer. Thanks in any case.

Comment #3131 by Dario Weißmann on

Yes, I think it's better. Although I really would like the term 'well-ordered by inclusion' in there somewhere. Maybe something like:

Let be a ring. Suppose we have a module where the are submodules well-ordered by inclusion. Further assume that the quotients have projective dimension . Then has projective dimension .

It's a bit longer though...

Comment #3135 by on

@#3131 This is good and when I remove the word "Further" it is the same length as what I had. Thanks! Changes here.

Comment #3157 by Dario Weißmann on

Shouldn't it be 'submoduleS' though? Sorry for bringing this up again.

There are also:

  • 1 comment(s) on Section 10.109: Rings of finite global dimension

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.