Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 13.41.3. Let \mathcal{D} be a triangulated category. Consider Postnikov systems for complexes of length n.

  1. For n = 0 Postnikov systems always exist and any morphism (13.41.1.1) of complexes extends to a unique morphism of Postnikov systems.

  2. For n = 1 Postnikov systems always exist and any morphism (13.41.1.1) of complexes extends to a (nonunique) morphism of Postnikov systems.

  3. For n = 2 Postnikov systems always exist but morphisms (13.41.1.1) of complexes in general do not extend to morphisms of Postnikov systems.

  4. For n > 2 Postnikov systems do not always exist.

Proof. The case n = 0 is immediate as isomorphisms are invertible. The case n = 1 follows immediately from TR1 (existence of triangles) and TR3 (extending morphisms to triangles). For the case n = 2 we argue as follows. Set Y_0 = X_0. By the case n = 1 we can choose a Postnikov system

Y_1 \to X_1 \to Y_0 \to Y_1[1]

Since the composition X_2 \to X_1 \to X_0 is zero, we can factor X_2 \to X_1 (nonuniquely) as X_2 \to Y_1 \to X_1 by Lemma 13.4.2. Then we simply fit the morphism X_2 \to Y_1 into a distinguished triangle

Y_2 \to X_2 \to Y_1 \to Y_2[1]

to get the Postnikov system for n = 2. For n > 2 we cannot argue similarly, as we do not know whether the composition X_ n \to X_{n - 1} \to Y_{n - 1} is zero in \mathcal{D}. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.