Lemma 101.22.1. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be an algebraic stack. There exist open substacks

such that $\mathcal{X}''$ is DM, $\mathcal{X}'$ is quasi-DM, and such that these are the largest open substacks with these properties.

Lemma 101.22.1. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be an algebraic stack. There exist open substacks

\[ \mathcal{X}'' \subset \mathcal{X}' \subset \mathcal{X} \]

such that $\mathcal{X}''$ is DM, $\mathcal{X}'$ is quasi-DM, and such that these are the largest open substacks with these properties.

**Proof.**
All we are really saying here is that if $\mathcal{U} \subset \mathcal{X}$ and $\mathcal{V} \subset \mathcal{X}$ are open substacks which are DM, then the open substack $\mathcal{W} \subset \mathcal{X}$ with $|\mathcal{W}| = |\mathcal{U}| \cup |\mathcal{V}|$ is DM as well. (Similarly for quasi-DM.) Although this is a cheat, let us use Theorem 101.21.6 to prove this. By that theorem we can choose schemes $U$ and $V$ and surjective étale morphisms $U \to \mathcal{U}$ and $V \to \mathcal{V}$. Then of course $U \amalg V \to \mathcal{W}$ is surjective and étale. The quasi-DM case is proven by exactly the same method using Theorem 101.21.3.
$\square$

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)