Proposition 52.13.1. Let I \subset \mathfrak a be ideals of a Noetherian ring A. Let \mathcal{F} be a coherent module on U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \setminus V(\mathfrak a). Let s \geq 0. Assume
A is I-adically complete and has a dualizing complex,
if x \in U \setminus V(I) then \text{depth}(\mathcal{F}_ x) > s or
\text{depth}(\mathcal{F}_ x) + \dim (\mathcal{O}_{\overline{\{ x\} }, z}) > \text{cd}(A, I) + s + 1
for all z \in V(\mathfrak a) \cap \overline{\{ x\} },
one of the following conditions holds:
the restriction of \mathcal{F} to U \setminus V(I) is (S_{s + 1}), or
the dimension of V(\mathfrak a) is at most 21.
Then the maps
H^ i(U, \mathcal{F}) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits H^ i(U, \mathcal{F}/I^ n\mathcal{F})
are isomorphisms for i < s. Moreover we have an isomorphism
\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits H^ s(V, \mathcal{F}) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits H^ s(U, \mathcal{F}/I^ n\mathcal{F})
where the colimit is over opens V \subset U containing U \cap V(I).
Proof.
We may assume s > 0 as the case s = 0 was done in Proposition 52.12.3.
Choose a finite A-module M such that \mathcal{F} is the restriction to U of the coherent module associated to M, see Local Cohomology, Lemma 51.8.2. Set d = \text{cd}(A, I). Let \mathfrak p be a prime of A not contained in V(I) and let \mathfrak q \in V(\mathfrak p) \cap V(\mathfrak a). Then either \text{depth}(M_\mathfrak p) \geq s + 1 > s or we have \dim ((A/\mathfrak p)_\mathfrak q) > d + s + 1 by (2). By Lemma 52.10.5 we conclude that the assumptions of Situation 52.10.1 are satisfied for A, I, V(\mathfrak a), M, s, d. On the other hand, the hypotheses of Lemma 52.8.5 are satisfied for s + 1 and d; this is where condition (3) is used.
Applying Lemma 52.8.5 we find there exists an ideal J_0 \subset \mathfrak a with V(J_0) \cap V(I) = V(\mathfrak a) such that for any J \subset J_0 with V(J) \cap V(I) = V(\mathfrak a) the maps
H^ i_ J(M) \longrightarrow H^ i(R\Gamma _\mathfrak a(M)^\wedge )
is an isomorphism for i \leq s + 1.
For i \leq s the map H^ i_\mathfrak a(M) \to H^ i_ J(M) is an isomorphism by Lemmas 52.10.3 and 52.8.4. Using the comparison of cohomology and local cohomology (Local Cohomology, Lemma 51.2.2) we deduce H^ i(U, \mathcal{F}) \to H^ i(V,\mathcal{F}) is an isomorphism for V = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \setminus V(J) and i < s.
By Theorem 52.10.8 we have H^ i_\mathfrak a(M) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits H^ i_\mathfrak a(M/I^ nM) for i \leq s. By Lemma 52.10.9 we have H^{s + 1}_\mathfrak a(M) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits H^{s + 1}_\mathfrak a(M/I^ nM).
The isomorphism H^0(U, \mathcal{F}) = H^0(V, \mathcal{F}) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits H^0(U, \mathcal{F}/I^ n\mathcal{F}) follows from the above and Proposition 52.12.3. For 0 < i < s we get the desired isomorphisms H^ i(U, \mathcal{F}) = H^ i(V, \mathcal{F}) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits H^ i(U, \mathcal{F}/I^ n\mathcal{F}) in the same manner using the relation between local cohomology and cohomology; it is easier than the case i = 0 because for i > 0 we have
H^ i(U, \mathcal{F}) = H^{i + 1}_\mathfrak a(M), \quad H^ i(V, \mathcal{F}) = H^{i + 1}_ J(M), \quad H^ i(R\Gamma (U, \mathcal{F})^\wedge ) = H^{i + 1}(R\Gamma _\mathfrak a(M)^\wedge )
Similarly for the final statement.
\square
Comments (0)