Lemma 42.20.1. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X, Y be schemes locally of finite type over S. Assume Y integral with \dim _\delta (Y) = k. Let f : X \to Y be a flat morphism of relative dimension r. Then for g \in R(Y)^* we have
f^*\text{div}_ Y(g) = \sum n_ j i_{j, *}\text{div}_{X_ j}(g \circ f|_{X_ j})
as (k + r - 1)-cycles on X where the sum is over the irreducible components X_ j of X and n_ j is the multiplicity of X_ j in X.
Proof.
Let Z \subset X be an integral closed subscheme of \delta -dimension k + r - 1. We have to show that the coefficient n of [Z] in f^*\text{div}(g) is equal to the coefficient m of [Z] in \sum i_{j, *} \text{div}(g \circ f|_{X_ j}). Let Z' be the closure of f(Z) which is an integral closed subscheme of Y. By Lemma 42.13.1 we have \dim _\delta (Z') \geq k - 1. Thus either Z' = Y or Z' is a prime divisor on Y. If Z' = Y, then the coefficients n and m are both zero: this is clear for n by definition of f^* and follows for m because g \circ f|_{X_ j} is a unit in any point of X_ j mapping to the generic point of Y. Hence we may assume that Z' \subset Y is a prime divisor.
We are going to translate the equality of n and m into algebra. Namely, let \xi ' \in Z' and \xi \in Z be the generic points. Set A = \mathcal{O}_{Y, \xi '} and B = \mathcal{O}_{X, \xi }. Note that A, B are Noetherian, A \to B is flat, local, A is a domain, and \mathfrak m_ AB is an ideal of definition of the local ring B. The rational function g is an element of the fraction field Q(A) of A. By construction, the closed subschemes X_ j which meet \xi correspond 1-to-1 with minimal primes
\mathfrak q_1, \ldots , \mathfrak q_ s \subset B
The integers n_ j are the corresponding lengths
n_ i = \text{length}_{B_{\mathfrak q_ i}}(B_{\mathfrak q_ i})
The rational functions g \circ f|_{X_ j} correspond to the image g_ i \in \kappa (\mathfrak q_ i)^* of g \in Q(A). Putting everything together we see that
n = \text{ord}_ A(g) \text{length}_ B(B/\mathfrak m_ AB)
and that
m = \sum \text{ord}_{B/\mathfrak q_ i}(g_ i) \text{length}_{B_{\mathfrak q_ i}}(B_{\mathfrak q_ i})
Writing g = x/y for some nonzero x, y \in A we see that it suffices to prove
\text{length}_ A(A/(x)) \text{length}_ B(B/\mathfrak m_ AB) = \text{length}_ B(B/xB)
(equality uses Algebra, Lemma 10.52.13) equals
\sum \nolimits _{i = 1, \ldots , s} \text{length}_{B/\mathfrak q_ i}(B/(x, \mathfrak q_ i)) \text{length}_{B_{\mathfrak q_ i}}(B_{\mathfrak q_ i})
and similarly for y. As A \to B is flat it follows that x is a nonzerodivisor in B. Hence the desired equality follows from Lemma 42.3.2.
\square
Comments (0)
There are also: