Loading web-font TeX/Main/Regular

The Stacks project

Lemma 42.25.3. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let Y be locally of finite type over S. Let \mathcal{L} be an invertible \mathcal{O}_ Y-module. Let s \in \Gamma (Y, \mathcal{L}). Assume

  1. \dim _\delta (Y) \leq k + 1,

  2. \dim _\delta (Z(s)) \leq k, and

  3. for every generic point \xi of an irreducible component of Z(s) of \delta -dimension k the multiplication by s induces an injection \mathcal{O}_{Y, \xi } \to \mathcal{L}_\xi .

Write [Y]_{k + 1} = \sum n_ i[Y_ i] where Y_ i \subset Y are the irreducible components of Y of \delta -dimension k + 1. Set s_ i = s|_{Y_ i} \in \Gamma (Y_ i, \mathcal{L}|_{Y_ i}). Then

42.25.3.1
\begin{equation} \label{chow-equation-equal-as-cycles} [Z(s)]_ k = \sum n_ i[Z(s_ i)]_ k \end{equation}

as k-cycles on Y.

Proof. Let Z \subset Y be an integral closed subscheme of \delta -dimension k. Let \xi \in Z be its generic point. We want to compare the coefficient n of [Z] in the expression \sum n_ i[Z(s_ i)]_ k with the coefficient m of [Z] in the expression [Z(s)]_ k. Choose a generator s_\xi \in \mathcal{L}_\xi . Write A = \mathcal{O}_{Y, \xi }, L = \mathcal{L}_\xi . Then L = As_\xi . Write s = f s_\xi for some (unique) f \in A. Hypothesis (3) means that f : A \to A is injective. Since \dim _\delta (Y) \leq k + 1 and \dim _\delta (Z) = k we have \dim (A) = 0 or 1. We have

m = \text{length}_ A(A/(f))

which is finite in either case.

If \dim (A) = 0, then f : A \to A being injective implies that f \in A^*. Hence in this case m is zero. Moreover, the condition \dim (A) = 0 means that \xi does not lie on any irreducible component of \delta -dimension k + 1, i.e., n = 0 as well.

Now, let \dim (A) = 1. Since A is a Noetherian local ring it has finitely many minimal primes \mathfrak q_1, \ldots , \mathfrak q_ t. These correspond 1-1 with the Y_ i passing through \xi '. Moreover n_ i = \text{length}_{A_{\mathfrak q_ i}}(A_{\mathfrak q_ i}). Also, the multiplicity of [Z] in [Z(s_ i)]_ k is \text{length}_ A(A/(f, \mathfrak q_ i)). Hence the equation to prove in this case is

\text{length}_ A(A/(f)) = \sum \text{length}_{A_{\mathfrak q_ i}}(A_{\mathfrak q_ i}) \text{length}_ A(A/(f, \mathfrak q_ i))

which follows from Lemma 42.3.2. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 42.25: Intersecting with an invertible sheaf

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.