Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Remark 42.56.7. Let X be a locally Noetherian scheme. Let Z \subset X be a closed subscheme. Consider the strictly full, saturated, triangulated subcategory

D_{Z, perf}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \subset D(\mathcal{O}_ X)

consisting of perfect complexes of \mathcal{O}_ X-modules whose cohomology sheaves are settheoretically supported on Z. Denote \textit{Coh}_ Z(X) \subset \textit{Coh}(X) the Serre subcategory of coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-modules whose set theoretic support is contained in Z. Observe that given E \in D_{Z, perf}(\mathcal{O}_ X) Zariski locally on X only a finite number of the cohomology sheaves H^ i(E) are nonzero (and they are all settheoretically supported on Z). Hence we can define

K_0(D_{Z, perf}(\mathcal{O}_ X)) \longrightarrow K_0(\textit{Coh}_ Z(X)) = K'_0(Z)

(equality by Lemma 42.23.6) by the rule

E \longmapsto [\bigoplus \nolimits _{i \in \mathbf{Z}} H^{2i}(E)] - [\bigoplus \nolimits _{i \in \mathbf{Z}} H^{2i + 1}(E)]

This works because given a distinguished triangle in D_{Z, perf}(\mathcal{O}_ X) we have a long exact sequence of cohomology sheaves.


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.