The Stacks project

Example 15.11.13 (Moret-Bailly). Lemma 15.11.12 is wrong if the colimit isn't filtered. For example, if we take the coproduct of the henselian pairs $(\mathbf{Z}_ p, (p))$ and $(\mathbf{Z}_ p, (p))$, then we obtain $(A, pA)$ with $A = \mathbf{Z}_ p \otimes _\mathbf {Z} \mathbf{Z}_ p$. This isn't a henslian pair: $A/pA = \mathbf{F}_ p$ hence if $(A, pA)$ where henselian, then $A$ would have to be local. However, $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ is disconnected; for example for odd primes $p$ we have the nontrivial idempotent $(1 + p)^{-1}u \otimes u$ where $u \in \mathbf{Z}_ p$ is a square root of $1 + p$. Some details omitted.


Comments (2)

Comment #4907 by Laurent Moret-Bailly on

This element has square 1; an idempotent derived from it is .

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 15.11: Henselian pairs

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0FWU. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.