The Stacks project

Lemma 13.4.8. Let $\mathcal{D}$ be a pre-triangulated category. Let

\[ (a, b, c) : (X, Y, Z, f, g, h) \to (X', Y', Z', f', g', h') \]

be a morphism of distinguished triangles. If one of the following conditions holds

  1. $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (Y, X') = 0$,

  2. $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (Z, Y') = 0$,

  3. $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (X, X') = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (Z, X') = 0$,

  4. $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (Z, X') = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (Z, Z') = 0$, or

  5. $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (X[1], Z') = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (Z, X') = 0$

then $b$ is the unique morphism from $Y \to Y'$ such that $(a, b, c)$ is a morphism of triangles.

Proof. If we have a second morphism of triangles $(a, b', c)$ then $(0, b - b', 0)$ is a morphism of triangles. Hence we have to show: the only morphism $b : Y \to Y'$ such that the $X \to Y \to Y'$ and $Y \to Y' \to Z'$ are zero is $0$. We will use Lemma 13.4.2 without further mention. In particular, condition (3) implies (1). Given condition (1) if the composition $b : Y \to Y' \to Z'$ is zero, then $b$ lifts to a morphism $Y \to X'$ which has to be zero. This proves (1).

The proof of (2) and (4) are dual to this argument.

Assume (5). Consider the diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ X \ar[r]_ f \ar[d]^0 & Y \ar[r]_ g \ar[d]^ b & Z \ar[r]_ h \ar[d]^0 \ar@{..>}[ld]^\epsilon & X[1] \ar[d]^0 \\ X' \ar[r]^{f'} & Y' \ar[r]^{g'} & Z' \ar[r]^{h'} & X'[1] } \]

We may choose $\epsilon $ such that $b = g \circ \epsilon $. Then $g' \circ \epsilon \circ g = 0$ which implies that $g' \circ \epsilon = \delta \circ h$ for some $\delta \in \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (X[1], Z')$. Since $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (X[1], Z') = 0$ we conclude that $g' \circ \epsilon = 0$. Hence $\epsilon = f' \circ \gamma $ for some $\gamma \in \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (Z, X')$. Since $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (Z, X') = 0$ we conclude that $\epsilon = 0$ and hence $b = 0$ as desired. $\square$


Comments (1)

Comment #5898 by Taro konno on

Two typos in the proof ; should be in "Given condition (1) if the composition is zero, then lifts to a morphism which has to be zero." should be in "We may choose such that . "

There are also:

  • 13 comment(s) on Section 13.4: Elementary results on triangulated categories

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0FWZ. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.