Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 10.11.4. Let R be a ring. Let N be an R-module. The following are equivalent

  1. N is a finitely presented R-module,

  2. for any filtered colimit M = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits M_ i of R-modules the map \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(N, M_ i) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(N, M) is bijective.

Proof. Assume (1) and choose an exact sequence F_{-1} \to F_0 \to N \to 0 with F_ i finite free. Then we have an exact sequence

0 \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(N, M) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(F_0, M) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(F_{-1}, M)

functorial in the R-module M. The functors \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(F_ i, M) commute with filtered colimits as \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(R^{\oplus n}, M) = M^{\oplus n}. Since filtered colimits are exact (Lemma 10.8.8) we see that (2) holds.

Assume (2). By Lemma 10.11.3 we can write N = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits N_ i as a filtered colimit such that N_ i is of finite presentation for all i. Thus \text{id}_ N factors through N_ i for some i. This means that N is a direct summand of a finitely presented R-module (namely N_ i) and hence finitely presented. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 4 comment(s) on Section 10.11: Characterizing finite and finitely presented modules

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.