Lemma 109.59.1. With $S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{F}_ p)$ the inclusion functor $(\textit{Noetherian}/S)_{fppf} \to (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$ does not define a morphism of sites.

## 109.59 Sheaves on the category of Noetherian schemes

Let $S$ be a locally Noetherian scheme. As in Artin's Axioms, Section 97.25 consider the inclusion functor

of the fppf site of locally Noetherian schemes over $S$ into a big fppf site of $S$. As explained in the section referenced, this functor is continuous. Hence we obtain an adjoint pair of functors

and

see Sites, Section 7.13. However, we claim that $u$ in general does not define a morphism of sites, see Sites, Definition 7.14.1. In other words, we claim that the functor $u_ s$ is not left exact in general.

Let $p$ be a prime number and set $S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{F}_ p)$. Consider the injective map of sheaves

on $(\textit{Noetherian}/S)_{fppf}$ defined as follows: for $U$ a locally Noetherian scheme over $S$ we define

and we take

A Noetherian $\mathbf{F}_ p$-algebra $A$ has a nilpotent nilradical $I \subset A$, the $p$-power roots of $1$ in $A$ are of the elements of the form $1 + a$, $a \in I$, and hence no-nontrivial $p$-power root of $1$ has arbitrary $p$-power roots. We conclude that $\mathcal{F}(U)$ is a $p$-torsion free abelian group for any locally Noetherian scheme $U$; some details omitted. It follows that $p : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}$ is an injective map of abelian sheaves on $(\textit{Noetherian}/S)_{fppf}$.

To get a contradiction, assume $u_ s$ is exact. Then $p : u_ s\mathcal{F} \to u_ s\mathcal{F}$ is injective too and we find that $(u_ s\mathcal{F})(V)$ is a $p$-torsion free abelian group for any $V$ over $S$. Since representable presheaves are sheaves on fppf sites, by Sites, Lemma 7.13.5, we see that $u_ s\mathcal{G}$ is represented by $\mathbf{G}_{m, S}$. Using that $u_ s\mathcal{F} \to u_ s\mathcal{G}$ is injective, we find a $p$-torsion free subgroup

for every scheme $V$ over $S$ with the following property: for every morphism $V \to U$ of schemes over $S$ with $U$ locally Noetherian the subgroup

maps into the subgroup $(u_ s\mathcal{F})(V)$ by the restriction mapping $\Gamma (U, \mathcal{O}_ U)^* \to \Gamma (V, \mathcal{O}_ V)^*$.

The actual contradiction now is obtained as follows: let $k = \bigcup _{n \geq 0} \mathbf{F}_ p(t^{1/{p^ n}})$ and set

and $V = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B)$. Since we have the two projection morphisms $V \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)$ corresponding to the two coprojections $k \to B$ and since $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)$ is Noetherian, we conclude the subgroup

contains $k^* \otimes 1$ and $1 \otimes k^*$. This is a contradiction because

is a nontrivial $p$-torsion unit of $B$.

**Proof.**
See discussion above.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)