Processing math: 1%

The Stacks project

Proposition 3.3.6 of “Intro to Algebraic Stacks” by Anatoly Preygel.

Proposition 106.15.1. Let \mathcal{X} be an algebraic stack with quasi-affine1 diagonal. Then \mathcal{X} satisfies descent for fpqc coverings.

Proof. Our conventions are that \mathcal{X} is a stack in groupoids p : \mathcal{X} \to (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} over the category of schemes over a base scheme S endowed with the fppf topology. The statement means the following: given an fpqc covering \mathcal{U} = \{ U_ i \to U\} _{i \in I} of schemes over S the functor

\mathcal{X}_ U \longrightarrow DD(\mathcal{U})

is an equivalence. Here on the left we have the category of objects of \mathcal{X} over U and on the right we have the category of descent data in \mathcal{X} relative to \mathcal{U}. See discussion in Stacks, Section 8.3.

Fully faithfulness. Suppose we have two objects x, y of \mathcal{X} over U. Then I = \mathit{Isom}(x, y) is an algebraic space over U. Hence a collection of sections of I over U_ i whose restrictions to U_ i \times _ U U_ j agree, come from a unique section over U by the analogue of the proposition for algebraic spaces, see Properties of Spaces, Proposition 66.17.1. Thus our functor is fully faithful.

Essential surjectivity. Here we are given objects x_ i over U_ i and isomorphisms \varphi _{ij} : \text{pr}_0^*x_ i \to \text{pr}_1^*x_ j over U_ i \times _ U U_ j satisfying the cocyle condition over U_ i \times _ U U_ j \times _ U U_ k.

Let W be an affine scheme and let W \to \mathcal{X} be a morphism. For each i we can form

W_ i = U_ i \times _{x_ i, \mathcal{X}} W

The projection W_ i \to U_ i is quasi-affine as the diagonal of \mathcal{X} is quasi-affine. For each pair i, j \in I the isomorphism \varphi _{ij} induces an isomorphism

W_ i \times _ U U_ j = (U_ i \times _ U U_ j) \times _{x_ i \circ \text{pr}_0, \mathcal{X}} W \to (U_ i \times _ U U_ j) \times _{x_ j \circ \text{pr}_1, \mathcal{X}} W = U_ i \times _ U W_ j

Moreover, these isomorphisms satisfy the cocycle condition over U_ i \times _ U U_ j \times _ U U_ k. In other words, these isomorphisms define a descent datum on the schemes W_ i/U_ i relative to \mathcal{U}. By Descent, Lemma 35.38.1 we see that this descent datum is effective2. We conclude that there exists a quasi-affine morphism W' \to U and a commutative diagram

\xymatrix{ W' \ar[d] & W_ i \ar[l] \ar[d] \ar[r] & W \ar[d] \\ U & U_ i \ar[l] \ar[r]^{x_ i} & \mathcal{X} }

whose squares are cartesian. Since \{ W_ i \to W'\} _{i \in I} is the base change of \mathcal{U} by W' \to U we conclude that it is an fpqc covering. Since W satisfies the sheaf condition for fpqc coverings, we obtain a unique morphism W' \to W such that W_ i \to W' \to W is the given morphism W_ i \to W. In other words, we have the commutative diagrams

\xymatrix{ W_ i \ar[d] \ar[r] & W' \ar[d] \ar[r] & W \ar[d] \\ U_ i \ar[r] \ar@/_1pc/[rr]_{x_ i} & U & \mathcal{X} }

compatible with the isomorphisms \varphi _{ij} and whose square and rectangle are cartesian.

Choose a collection of affine schemes W_\alpha , \alpha \in A and smooth morphisms W_\alpha \to \mathcal{X} such that \coprod W_\alpha \to \mathcal{X} is surjective. By the procedure of the preceding paragraph we produce a diagram

\xymatrix{ W_{\alpha , i} \ar[d] \ar[r] & W_\alpha ' \ar[d] \ar[r] & W_\alpha \ar[d] \\ U_ i \ar[r] \ar@/_1pc/[rr]_{x_ i} & U & \mathcal{X} }

for each \alpha . Then the morphisms W_\alpha ' \to U are smooth and jointly surjective.

Denote x_\alpha the object of \mathcal{X} over W_\alpha ' corresponding to W_\alpha ' \to W_\alpha \to \mathcal{X}. Since \mathcal{X} is an fppf stack and since \{ W_\alpha ' \to U\} is an fppf covering, it suffices to show that there are isomorphisms \text{pr}_0^*x_\alpha \to \text{pr}_1^*x_\beta over W_\alpha ' \times _ U W'_\beta satisfying the cocycle condition. However, after pulling back to W_{\alpha , i} we do have such isomorphisms over W_{\alpha , i} \times _{U_ i} W_{\beta , i} = U_ i \times _ U (W_\alpha ' \times _ U W'_\beta ) since the pullback of x_\alpha to W_{\alpha , i} is isomorphic to the pullback of x_ i to W_{\alpha , i}. Since \{ U_ i \times _ U (W_\alpha ' \times _ U W'_\beta ) \to W_\alpha ' \times _ U W'_\beta \} _{i \in I} is an fpqc covering and by the aforementioned compatibility of the diagrams above with \varphi _{ij} these isomorphisms descend to W_\alpha ' \times _ U W'_\beta and the proof is complete. \square

[1] It suffices to assume ind-quasi-affine.
[2] Or use More on Groupoids, Lemma 40.15.3 in the case of ind-quasi-affine diagonal.

Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.