The Stacks project

Lemma 9.6.9. Let $k$ be a field and let $E/k$ and $F/k$ be field extensions. Then there exists a common field extension $M/k$, i.e., an extension field such that there exist maps $E \to M$ and $F \to M$ of extensions of $k$.

Proof. We only prove this when $E$ is a finitely generated field extension of $k$; the general case follows from this by a Zorn's lemma type argument (details omitted).

First, suppose that $E$ is a simple extension of $k$. By Lemma 9.6.8 this means either $E = k(t)$ is the rational function field or $E = k[t]/(P)$ for some irreducible polynomial $P \in k[t]$. In the first case, we take $M = F(t)$ the rational function field with obvious maps $E \to M$ and $F \to M$. In the second case, we choose an irreducible factor $Q$ of the image of $P$ in $F[t]$ and we take $M = F[t]/(Q)$ with obvious maps $E \to M$ and $F \to M$.

If $E = k(\alpha _1, \ldots , \alpha _ n)$, then by induction on $n$ we can find an extension $M/k$ and maps $F \to M$ and $k(\alpha _1, \ldots , \alpha _{n - 1}) \to M$. By the simple case discussed in the previous paragraph, we can find an extension $M'/k(\alpha _1, \ldots , \alpha _{n - 1})$ and maps $M \to M'$ and $k(\alpha _1, \ldots , \alpha _ n) \to M'$. Then $M'$ viewed as an extension of $k$ works. $\square$


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 9.6: Field extensions

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0H7K. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.