The Stacks project

Lemma 10.12.7. For $A$-module $M$, $B$-module $P$ and $(A, B)$-bimodule $N$, the modules $(M \otimes _ A N)\otimes _ B P$ and $M \otimes _ A(N \otimes _ B P)$ can both be given $(A, B)$-bimodule structure, and moreover

\[ (M \otimes _ A N)\otimes _ B P \cong M \otimes _ A(N \otimes _ B P). \]

Proof. A priori $M \otimes _ A N$ is an $A$-module, but we can give it a $B$-module structure by letting

\[ (x \otimes y)b = x \otimes yb, \quad x\in M, y\in N, b\in B \]

Thus $M \otimes _ A N$ becomes an $(A, B)$-bimodule. Similarly for $N \otimes _ B P$, and thus for $(M \otimes _ A N)\otimes _ B P$ and $M \otimes _ A(N \otimes _ B P)$. By Lemma 10.12.5, these two modules are isomorphic as both as $A$-module and $B$-module via the same mapping. $\square$

Comments (2)

Comment #393 by Fan on

In the first line, and are not in mathmode.

Comment #398 by on

Good catch! I wonder if there is a way to find all of these using a python script?

There are also:

  • 4 comment(s) on Section 10.12: Tensor products

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 00D2. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.