Lemma 10.123.3. Let R be a ring. Let \varphi : R[x] \to S be a ring map. Let t \in S. Assume t is integral over R[x]. Let p \in R[x], p = a_0 + a_1x + \ldots + a_ k x^ k such that t \varphi (p) \in \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\varphi ). Then there exists a q \in R[x] and n \geq 0 such that \varphi (a_ k)^ n t - \varphi (q) is integral over R.
Proof. Let R' and S' be the localization of R and S at the element a_ k. Let \varphi ' : R'[x] \to S' be the localization of \varphi . Let t' \in S' be the image of t. Set p' = p/a_ k \in R'[x]. Then t' \varphi '(p') \in \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\varphi ') since t \varphi (p) \in \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\varphi ). As p' is monic, by Lemma 10.123.2 there exists a q' \in R'[x] such that t' - \varphi '(q') is integral over R'. We may choose an n \geq 0 and an element q \in R[x] such that a_ k^ n q' is the image of q. Then \varphi (a_ k)^ n t - \varphi (q) is an element of S whose image in S' is integral over R'. By Lemma 10.36.11 there exists an m \geq 0 such that \varphi (a_ k)^ m(\varphi (a_ k)^ n t - \varphi (q)) is integral over R. Thus \varphi (a_ k)^{m + n}t - \varphi (a_ k^ m q) is integral over R as desired. \square
Comments (2)
Comment #3631 by Brian Conrad on
Comment #3730 by Johan on
There are also: