Lemma 10.131.14. If S = R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n], then \Omega _{S/R} is a finite free S-module with basis \text{d}x_1, \ldots , \text{d}x_ n.
Proof. We first show that \text{d}x_1, \ldots , \text{d}x_ n generate \Omega _{S/R} as an S-module. To prove this we show that \text{d}g can be expressed as a sum \sum g_ i \text{d}x_ i for any g \in R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]. We do this by induction on the (total) degree of g. It is clear if the degree of g is 0, because then \text{d}g = 0. If the degree of g is > 0, then we may write g as c + \sum g_ i x_ i with c\in R and \deg (g_ i) < \deg (g). By the Leibniz rule we have \text{d}g = \sum g_ i \text{d} x_ i + \sum x_ i \text{d}g_ i, and hence we win by induction.
Consider the R-derivation \partial / \partial x_ i : R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n] \to R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]. (We leave it to the reader to define this; the defining property being that \partial / \partial x_ i (x_ j) = \delta _{ij}.) By the universal property this corresponds to an S-module map l_ i : \Omega _{S/R} \to R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n] which maps \text{d}x_ i to 1 and \text{d}x_ j to 0 for j \not= i. Thus it is clear that there are no S-linear relations among the elements \text{d}x_1, \ldots , \text{d}x_ n. \square
Comments (1)
Comment #1087 by Nuno Cardoso on
There are also: