Lemma 10.131.13. Let R \to S be a ring map. Let J = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(S \otimes _ R S \to S) be the kernel of the multiplication map. There is a canonical isomorphism of S-modules \Omega _{S/R} \to J/J^2, a \text{d} b \mapsto a \otimes b - ab \otimes 1.
First proof. Apply Lemma 10.131.10 to the commutative diagram
where the left vertical arrow is a \mapsto a \otimes 1. We get the exact sequence 0 \to J/J^2 \to \Omega _{S \otimes _ R S/S} \otimes _{S \otimes _ R S} S \to \Omega _{S/S} \to 0. By Lemma 10.131.4 the term \Omega _{S/S} is 0, and we obtain an isomorphism between the other two terms. We have \Omega _{S \otimes _ R S/S} = \Omega _{S/R} \otimes _ S (S \otimes _ R S) by Lemma 10.131.12 as S \to S \otimes _ R S is the base change of R \to S and hence
We omit the verification that the map is given by the rule of the lemma. \square
Second proof. First we show that the rule a \text{d} b \mapsto a \otimes b - ab \otimes 1 is well defined. In order to do this we have to show that \text{d}r and a\text{d}b + b \text{d}a - d(ab) map to zero. The first because r \otimes 1 - 1 \otimes r = 0 by definition of the tensor product. The second because
is in J^2.
We construct a map in the other direction. We may think of S \to S \otimes _ R S, a \mapsto a \otimes 1 as the base change of R \to S. Hence we have \Omega _{S \otimes _ R S/S} = \Omega _{S/R} \otimes _ S (S \otimes _ R S), by Lemma 10.131.12. At this point the sequence of Lemma 10.131.9 gives a map
We leave it to the reader to see it is the inverse of the map above. \square
Comments (2)
Comment #1694 by Jeroen Sijsling on
Comment #1742 by Johan on
There are also: