The Stacks project

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

7.3 Injective and surjective maps of presheaves

Definition 7.3.1. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category, and let $\varphi : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}$ be a map of presheaves of sets.

  1. We say that $\varphi $ is injective if for every object $U$ of $\mathcal{C}$ the map $\varphi _ U : \mathcal{F}(U) \to \mathcal{G}(U)$ is injective.

  2. We say that $\varphi $ is surjective if for every object $U$ of $\mathcal{C}$ the map $\varphi _ U : \mathcal{F}(U) \to \mathcal{G}(U)$ is surjective.

Lemma 7.3.2. The injective (resp. surjective) maps defined above are exactly the monomorphisms (resp. epimorphisms) of $\textit{PSh}(\mathcal{C})$. A map is an isomorphism if and only if it is both injective and surjective.

Proof. We shall show that $\varphi : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}$ is injective if and only if it is a monomorphism of $\textit{PSh}(\mathcal{C})$. Indeed, the “only if” direction is straightforward, so let us show the “if” direction. Assume that $\varphi $ is a monomorphism. Let $U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$; we need to show that $\varphi _ U$ is injective. So let $a, b \in \mathcal{F}(U)$ be such that $\varphi _ U (a) = \varphi _ U (b)$; we need to check that $a = b$. Under the isomorphism (7.2.1.1), the elements $a$ and $b$ of $\mathcal{F}(U)$ correspond to two natural transformations $a', b' \in \mathop{Mor}\nolimits _{\textit{PSh}(\mathcal{C})}(h_ U, \mathcal{F})$. Similarly, under the analogous isomorphism $\mathop{Mor}\nolimits _{\textit{PSh}(\mathcal{C})}(h_ U, \mathcal{G}) = \mathcal{G}(U)$, the two equal elements $\varphi _ U (a)$ and $\varphi _ U (b)$ of $\mathcal{G}(U)$ correspond to the two natural transformations $\varphi \circ a', \varphi \circ b' \in \mathop{Mor}\nolimits _{\textit{PSh}(\mathcal{C})}(h_ U, \mathcal{G})$, which therefore must also be equal. So $\varphi \circ a' = \varphi \circ b'$, and thus $a' = b'$ (since $\varphi $ is monic), whence $a = b$. This finishes (1).

We shall show that $\varphi : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}$ is surjective if and only if it is an epimorphism of $\textit{PSh}(\mathcal{C})$. Indeed, the “only if” direction is straightforward, so let us show the “if” direction. Assume that $\varphi $ is an epimorphism.

For any two morphisms $f : A \to B$ and $g : A \to C$ in the category $\textit{Sets}$, we let $\text{inl}_{f,g}$ and $\text{inr}_{f,g}$ denote the two canonical maps from $B$ and $C$ to $B \coprod _ A C$. (Here, the pushout is evaluated in $\textit{Sets}$.)

Now, we define a presheaf $\mathcal{H}$ of sets on $\mathcal{C}$ by setting $\mathcal{H}(U) = \mathcal{G}(U) \coprod _{\mathcal{F}(U)} \mathcal{G}(U)$ (where the pushout is evaluated in $\textit{Sets}$ and induced by the map $\varphi _ U : \mathcal{F}(U) \to \mathcal{G}(U)$) for every $U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$; its action on morphisms is defined in the obvious way (by the functoriality of pushout). Then, there are two natural transformations $i_1 : \mathcal{G} \to \mathcal{H}$ and $i_2 : \mathcal{G} \to \mathcal{H}$ whose components at an object $U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$ are given by the maps $\text{inl}_{\varphi _ U, \varphi _ U}$ and $\text{inr}_{\varphi _ U, \varphi _ U}$, respectively. The definition of a pushout shows that $i_1 \circ \varphi = i_2 \circ \varphi $, whence $i_1 = i_2$ (since $\varphi $ is an epimorphism). Thus, for every $U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$, we have $\text{inl}_{\varphi _ U, \varphi _ U} = \text{inr}_{\varphi _ U, \varphi _ U}$. Thus, $\varphi _ U$ must be surjective (since a simple combinatorial argument shows that if $f : A \to B$ is a morphism in $\textit{Sets}$, then $\text{inl}_{f,f} = \text{inr}_{f,f}$ if and only if $f$ is surjective). In other words, $\varphi $ is surjective, and (2) is proven.

We shall show that $\varphi : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}$ is both injective and surjective if and only if it is an isomorphism of $\textit{PSh}(\mathcal{C})$. This time, the “if” direction is straightforward. To prove the “only if” direction, it suffices to observe that if $\varphi $ is both injective and surjective, then $\varphi _ U$ is an invertible map for every $U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$, and the inverses of these maps for all $U$ can be combined to a natural transformation $\mathcal{G} \to \mathcal{F}$ which is an inverse to $\varphi $. $\square$

Definition 7.3.3. We say $\mathcal{F}$ is a subpresheaf of $\mathcal{G}$ if for every object $U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$ the set $\mathcal{F}(U)$ is a subset of $\mathcal{G}(U)$, compatibly with the restriction mappings.

In other words, the inclusion maps $\mathcal{F}(U) \to \mathcal{G}(U)$ glue together to give an (injective) morphism of presheaves $\mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}$.

Lemma 7.3.4. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category. Suppose that $\varphi : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}$ is a morphism of presheaves of sets on $\mathcal{C}$. There exists a unique subpresheaf $\mathcal{G}' \subset \mathcal{G}$ such that $\varphi $ factors as $\mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}' \to \mathcal{G}$ and such that the first map is surjective.

Proof. To prove existence, just set $\mathcal{G}'(U) = \varphi _ U \left(\mathcal{F}(U)\right)$ for every $U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (C)$ (and inherit the action on morphisms from $\mathcal{G}$), and prove that this defines a subpresheaf of $\mathcal{G}$ and that $\varphi $ factors as $\mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}' \to \mathcal{G}$ with the first map being surjective. Uniqueness is straightforward. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 00V5. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.