Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 7.10.3. The constructions above define a presheaf \mathcal{F}^+ together with a canonical map of presheaves \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}^+.

Proof. All we have to do is to show that given morphisms W \to V \to U the composition \mathcal{F}^+(U) \to \mathcal{F}^+(V) \to \mathcal{F}^+(W) equals the map \mathcal{F}^+(U) \to \mathcal{F}^+(W). This can be shown directly by verifying that, given a covering \{ U_ i \to U\} and s = (s_ i) \in H^0(\{ U_ i \to U\} , \mathcal{F}), we have canonically W \times _ U U_ i \cong W \times _ V (V \times _ U U_ i), and s_ i|_{W \times _ U U_ i} corresponds to (s_ i|_{V \times _ U U_ i})|_{W \times _ V (V \times _ U U_ i)} via this isomorphism. \square


Comments (2)

Comment #8568 by Alejandro González Nevado on

SS: The colimit, when the coverings vary over the opposite of the category of all coverings of a fixed object on a site, of the zeroth Čech cohomology of a fixed presheaf of sets with respect to these coverings of the fixed object on the site defines a presheaf (the zeroth Čech cohomology of the fixed presheaf of sets over the fixed object on the site) and a canonical map of presheaves from the original sheaf to the one produced here via the colimit.

There are also:

  • 8 comment(s) on Section 7.10: Sheafification

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.