Lemma 14.23.6. Let \mathcal{A} be an abelian category. Let U be a simplicial object of \mathcal{A}. The canonical morphism of chain complexes N(U) \to s(U) is split. In fact,
for some complex D(U). The construction U \mapsto D(U) is functorial.
Lemma 14.23.6. Let \mathcal{A} be an abelian category. Let U be a simplicial object of \mathcal{A}. The canonical morphism of chain complexes N(U) \to s(U) is split. In fact,
for some complex D(U). The construction U \mapsto D(U) is functorial.
Proof. Define D(U)_ n to be the image of
which is a subobject of U_ n complementary to N(U_ n) according to Lemma 14.18.6 and Definition 14.18.1. We show that D(U) is a subcomplex. Pick a surjective map \varphi : [n] \to [m] with m < n and consider the composition
This composition is the sum of the maps
with sign (-1)^ i, i = 0, \ldots , n.
First we will prove by ascending induction on m, 0 \leq m < n - 1 that all the maps U(\varphi \circ \delta ^ n_ i) map N(U_ m) into D(U)_{n - 1}. (The case m = n - 1 is treated below.) Whenever the map \varphi \circ \delta ^ n_ i : [n - 1] \to [m] is surjective then the image of N(U_ m) under U(\varphi \circ \delta ^ n_ i) is contained in D(U)_{n - 1} by definition. If \varphi \circ \delta ^ n_ i : [n - 1] \to [m] is not surjective, set j = \varphi (i) and observe that i is the unique index whose image under \varphi is j. We may write \varphi \circ \delta ^ n_ i = \delta ^ m_ j \circ \psi \circ \delta ^ n_ i for some \psi : [n - 1] \to [m - 1]. Hence U(\varphi \circ \delta ^ n_ i) = U(\psi \circ \delta ^ n_ i) \circ d^ m_ j which is zero on N(U_ m) unless j = m. If j = m, then d^ m_ m(N(U_ m)) \subset N(U_{m - 1}) and hence U(\varphi \circ \delta ^ n_ i)(N(U_ m)) \subset U(\psi \circ \delta ^ n_ i)(N(U_{m - 1})) and we win by induction hypothesis.
To finish proving that D(U) is a subcomplex we still have to deal with the composition
in case m = n - 1. In this case \varphi = \sigma ^{n - 1}_ j for some 0 \leq j \leq n - 1 and U(\varphi ) = s^{n - 1}_ j. Thus the composition is given by the sum
Recall from Remark 14.3.3 that d^ n_ j \circ s^{n - 1}_ j = d^ n_{j + 1} \circ s^{n - 1}_ j = \text{id} and these drop out because the corresponding terms have opposite signs. The map d^ n_ n \circ s^{n - 1}_ j, if j < n - 1, is equal to s^{n - 2}_ j \circ d^{n - 1}_{n - 1}. Since d^{n - 1}_{n - 1} maps N(U_{n - 1}) into N(U_{n - 2}), we see that the image d^ n_ n ( s^{n - 1}_ j (N(U_{n - 1})) is contained in s^{n - 2}_ j(N(U_{n - 2})) which is contained in D(U_{n - 1}) by definition. For all other combinations of (i, j) we have either d^ n_ i \circ s^{n - 1}_ j = s^{n - 2}_{j - 1} \circ d^{n - 1}_ i (if i < j), or d^ n_ i \circ s^{n - 1}_ j = s^{n - 2}_ j \circ d^{n - 1}_{i - 1} (if n > i > j + 1) and in these cases the map is zero because of the definition of N(U_{n - 1}). \square
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (1)
Comment #2358 by Simon Pepin Lehalleur on