The Stacks project

Lemma 26.24.1. Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. If $f$ is quasi-compact and quasi-separated then $f_*$ transforms quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-modules into quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ S$-modules.

Proof. The question is local on $S$ and hence we may assume that $S$ is affine. Because $X$ is quasi-compact we may write $X = \bigcup _{i = 1}^ n U_ i$ with each $U_ i$ open affine. Because $f$ is quasi-separated we may write $U_ i \cap U_ j = \bigcup _{k = 1}^{n_{ij}} U_{ijk}$ for some affine open $U_{ijk}$, see Lemma 26.21.6. Denote $f_ i : U_ i \to S$ and $f_{ijk} : U_{ijk} \to S$ the restrictions of $f$. For any open $V$ of $S$ and any sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $X$ we have

\begin{eqnarray*} f_*\mathcal{F}(V) & = & \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}V) \\ & = & \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}\left( \bigoplus \nolimits _ i \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}V \cap U_ i) \to \bigoplus \nolimits _{i, j, k} \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}V \cap U_{ijk})\right) \\ & = & \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}\left( \bigoplus \nolimits _ i f_{i, *}(\mathcal{F}|_{U_ i})(V) \to \bigoplus \nolimits _{i, j, k} f_{ijk, *}(\mathcal{F}|_{U_{ijk}})(V)\right) \\ & = & \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}\left( \bigoplus \nolimits _ i f_{i, *}(\mathcal{F}|_{U_ i}) \to \bigoplus \nolimits _{i, j, k} f_{ijk, *}(\mathcal{F}|_{U_{ijk}})\right)(V) \end{eqnarray*}

In other words there is an exact sequence of sheaves

\[ 0 \to f_*\mathcal{F} \to \bigoplus f_{i, *}\mathcal{F}_ i \to \bigoplus f_{ijk, *}\mathcal{F}_{ijk} \]

where $\mathcal{F}_ i, \mathcal{F}_{ijk}$ denotes the restriction of $\mathcal{F}$ to the corresponding open. If $\mathcal{F}$ is a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module then $\mathcal{F}_ i$ is a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_{U_ i}$-module and $\mathcal{F}_{ijk}$ is a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_{U_{ijk}}$-module. Hence by Lemma 26.7.3 we see that the second and third term of the exact sequence are quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ S$-modules. Thus we conclude that $f_*\mathcal{F}$ is a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ S$-module. $\square$

Comments (6)

Comment #3619 by Dario WeiƟmann on

Typo: the bracket in the third line should be .

Comment #3722 by on

Thanks very much. This is a very confusing typo. Fixed here.

Comment #4729 by Simon on

additional s in last pragraph: it should say "If is a quasi-coherent -module"

Comment #6664 by WhatJiaranEatsTonight on

Why does the lemma not hold for general ? I cannot figure out which equality not holds if we replace finite directed sum by general infinite product of quasi-coherent sheaves.

Comment #6671 by on

@#6664. The product of quasi-coherent modules isn't usually quasi-coherent.

There are also:

  • 4 comment(s) on Section 26.24: Functoriality for quasi-coherent modules

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 01LC. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.