The Stacks project

Lemma 30.9.4. Let $X$ be a locally Noetherian scheme. Let $\mathcal{F}$, $\mathcal{G}$ be coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-modules. The $\mathcal{O}_ X$-modules $\mathcal{F} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{G}$ and $\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits _{\mathcal{O}_ X}(\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{G})$ are coherent.

Proof. It is shown in Modules, Lemma 17.22.6 that $\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits _{\mathcal{O}_ X}(\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{G})$ is coherent. The result for tensor products is Modules, Lemma 17.16.6 $\square$

Comments (2)

Comment #5854 by Takagi Benseki(高城 辨積) on

The locally Noetherian condition is really necessary for ? 01CQ and 01CE have no such condition on .

Comment #5855 by on

The Stacks project only considers coherent modules on schemes which are locally Noetherian. See introduction to Section 30.9. The main reason for this is that it is too easy to make mistakes if you don't do this, especially since we are all used to using coherent modules over Noetherian schemes (because we first encounter them in this setting as for example in Harthorne's book). For example, we often silently use the result of Lemma 30.9.3 for coherent modules in algebraic geometry (which doesn't hold for general ringed spaces or schemes).

But, yes, the results do hold more generally for arbitrary ringed spaces (as is shown in 17.22.6 and 17.16.6) as you mention. For those people who want to use coherent modules over non-Noetherian schemes they should look there.

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 30.9: Coherent sheaves on locally Noetherian schemes

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 01Y2. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.