History of tag 02JY
Go back to the tag's page.
type |
time |
link |
changed the statement
|
2019-09-02 |
f7db320 |
Added reference to guide.tex
Thanks to AAK
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/04V1#comment-4317
|
changed the statement
|
2018-10-22 |
85d76b7 |
Add references
Thanks to Takumi Murayama
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/02JY#comment-3546
|
changed the proof
|
2017-10-09 |
e6e9bb7 |
Fix reversal of names
Thanks to Ko Aoki
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/02JY#comment-2873
|
changed the proof
|
2015-03-12 |
da6468e |
amalg and coprod
|
changed the proof
|
2011-08-10 |
65ce54f |
LaTeX: \Spec
Introduced the macro
\def\Spec{\mathop{\rm Spec}}
and changed all the occurences of \text{Spec} into \Spec.
|
changed the statement
|
2010-01-09 |
ae8ec19 |
Specializing, Generizing and Submersive morphisms
Introduced the terminology listed above, as suggested by David
Rydh. In EGA I (new edition) they use g\'en\'erisant and I guess
the english form is indeed generizing, but I still have to get
used to it.
Also added: Lemma stating that every open morphism of schemss is
generizing which was missing (David Rydh).
|
changed the proof
|
2009-10-19 |
4ac058b |
Topology + Morphisms: Fix error in topology lemma + fallout
The error was in thinking that generalizations lift along any
open map of topological spaces, which they do not. An example
can be constructed relatively easily.
It turns out that we never used this anywhere in the rest of the
chapters, which is a lucky break. We fixed a comment about this
in the chapter on morphisms of schemes to be a little more
clear, and we added a lemma stating explicitly that
generalizations do lift along flat morphisms of schemes.
|
assigned tag 02JY
|
2009-06-15 |
76f13f6
|
Added new tags to the file tags/tags
modified: tags/tags
|
created statement with label lemma-fpqc-quotient-topology in morphisms.tex
|
2009-06-12 |
b57cd81 |
Descending properties of morphisms and related lemmas
modified: algebra.tex
modified: fpqc-descent.tex
modified: morphisms.tex
|