Lemma 35.23.21. The property \mathcal{P}(f) =“f is a quasi-compact immersion” is fpqc local on the base.
Proof. Let f : X \to Y be a morphism of schemes. Let \{ Y_ i \to Y\} be an fpqc covering. Write X_ i = Y_ i \times _ Y X and f_ i : X_ i \to Y_ i the base change of f. Also denote q_ i : Y_ i \to Y the given flat morphisms. Assume each f_ i is a quasi-compact immersion. By Schemes, Lemma 26.23.8 each f_ i is separated. By Lemmas 35.23.1 and 35.23.6 this implies that f is quasi-compact and separated. Let X \to Z \to Y be the factorization of f through its scheme theoretic image. By Morphisms, Lemma 29.6.3 the closed subscheme Z \subset Y is cut out by the quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals \mathcal{I} = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\mathcal{O}_ Y \to f_*\mathcal{O}_ X) as f is quasi-compact. By flat base change (see for example Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.5.2; here we use f is separated) we see f_{i, *}\mathcal{O}_{X_ i} is the pullback q_ i^*f_*\mathcal{O}_ X. Hence Y_ i \times _ Y Z is cut out by the quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals q_ i^*\mathcal{I} = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\mathcal{O}_{Y_ i} \to f_{i, *}\mathcal{O}_{X_ i}). By Morphisms, Lemma 29.7.7 the morphisms X_ i \to Y_ i \times _ Y Z are open immersions. Hence by Lemma 35.23.16 we see that X \to Z is an open immersion and hence f is a immersion as desired (we already saw it was quasi-compact). \square
Comments (0)
There are also: