Loading web-font TeX/Caligraphic/Regular

The Stacks project

Lemma 35.23.21. The property \mathcal{P}(f) =f is a quasi-compact immersion” is fpqc local on the base.

Proof. Let f : X \to Y be a morphism of schemes. Let \{ Y_ i \to Y\} be an fpqc covering. Write X_ i = Y_ i \times _ Y X and f_ i : X_ i \to Y_ i the base change of f. Also denote q_ i : Y_ i \to Y the given flat morphisms. Assume each f_ i is a quasi-compact immersion. By Schemes, Lemma 26.23.8 each f_ i is separated. By Lemmas 35.23.1 and 35.23.6 this implies that f is quasi-compact and separated. Let X \to Z \to Y be the factorization of f through its scheme theoretic image. By Morphisms, Lemma 29.6.3 the closed subscheme Z \subset Y is cut out by the quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals \mathcal{I} = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\mathcal{O}_ Y \to f_*\mathcal{O}_ X) as f is quasi-compact. By flat base change (see for example Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.5.2; here we use f is separated) we see f_{i, *}\mathcal{O}_{X_ i} is the pullback q_ i^*f_*\mathcal{O}_ X. Hence Y_ i \times _ Y Z is cut out by the quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals q_ i^*\mathcal{I} = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\mathcal{O}_{Y_ i} \to f_{i, *}\mathcal{O}_{X_ i}). By Morphisms, Lemma 29.7.7 the morphisms X_ i \to Y_ i \times _ Y Z are open immersions. Hence by Lemma 35.23.16 we see that X \to Z is an open immersion and hence f is a immersion as desired (we already saw it was quasi-compact). \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 35.23: Properties of morphisms local in the fpqc topology on the target

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.