Definition 12.11.1. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. We denote $K_0(\mathcal{A})$ the *zeroth $K$-group of $\mathcal{A}$*. It is the abelian group constructed as follows. Take the free abelian group on the objects on $\mathcal{A}$ and for every short exact sequence $0 \to A \to B \to C \to 0$ impose the relation $[B] - [A] - [C] = 0$.

## 12.11 K-groups

A tiny bit about $K_0$ of an abelian category.

Another way to say this is that there is a presentation

with $[A \to B \to C] \mapsto [B] - [A] - [C]$ of $K_0(\mathcal{A})$. The short exact sequence $0 \to 0 \to 0 \to 0 \to 0$ leads to the relation $[0] = 0$ in $K_0(\mathcal{A})$. There are no set-theoretical issues as all of our categories are “small” if not mentioned otherwise. Some examples of $K$-groups for categories of modules over rings where computed in Algebra, Section 10.55.

Lemma 12.11.2. Let $F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ be an exact functor between abelian categories. Then $F$ induces a homomorphism of $K$-groups $K_0(F) : K_0(\mathcal{A}) \to K_0(\mathcal{B})$ by simply setting $K_0(F)([A]) = [F(A)]$.

**Proof.**
Proves itself.
$\square$

Suppose we are given an object $M$ of an abelian category $\mathcal{A}$ and a complex of the form

In this situation we define

Lemma 12.11.3. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. Let $\mathcal{C} \subset \mathcal{A}$ be a Serre subcategory and set $\mathcal{B} = \mathcal{A}/\mathcal{C}$.

The exact functors $\mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ induce an exact sequence

\[ K_0(\mathcal{C}) \to K_0(\mathcal{A}) \to K_0(\mathcal{B}) \to 0 \]of $K$-groups, and

the kernel of $K_0(\mathcal{C}) \to K_0(\mathcal{A})$ is equal to the collection of elements of the form

\[ [H^0(M, \varphi , \psi )] - [H^1(M, \varphi , \psi )] \]where $(M, \varphi , \psi )$ is a complex as in (12.11.2.1) with the property that it becomes exact in $\mathcal{B}$; in other words that $H^0(M, \varphi , \psi )$ and $H^1(M, \varphi , \psi )$ are objects of $\mathcal{C}$.

**Proof.**
Proof of (1). It is clear that $K_0(\mathcal{A}) \to K_0(\mathcal{B})$ is surjective and that the composition $K_0(\mathcal{C}) \to K_0(\mathcal{A}) \to K_0(\mathcal{B})$ is zero. Let $x \in K_0(\mathcal{A})$ be an element mapping to zero in $K_0(\mathcal{B})$. We can write $x = [A] - [A']$ with $A, A'$ in $\mathcal{A}$ (fun exercise). Denote $B, B'$ the corresponding objects of $\mathcal{B}$. The fact that $x$ maps to zero in $K_0(\mathcal{B})$ means that there exists a finite set $I = I^+ \amalg I^{-}$, for each $i \in I$ a short exact sequence

in $\mathcal{B}$ such that we have

in the free abelian group on isomorphism classes of objects of $\mathcal{B}$. We can rewrite this as

Since the right and left hand side should contain the same isomorphism classes of objects of $\mathcal{B}$ counted with multiplicity, this means there should be a bijection

such that $N$ and $\tau (N)$ are isomorphic in $\mathcal{B}$. The proof of Lemmas 12.10.6 and 12.8.4 show that we choose for $i \in I$ a short exact sequence

in $\mathcal{A}$ such that $B_ i, B'_ i, B''_ i$ are isomorphic to the images of $A_ i, A'_ i, A''_ i$ in $\mathcal{B}$. This implies that the corresponding bijection

satisfies the property that $M$ and $\tau (M)$ are objects of $\mathcal{A}$ which become isomorphic in $\mathcal{B}$. This means $[M] - [\tau (M)]$ is in the image of $K_0(\mathcal{C}) \to K_0(\mathcal{A})$. Namely, the isomorphism in $\mathcal{B}$ is given by a diagram $M \leftarrow M' \rightarrow \tau (M)$ in $\mathcal{A}$ where both $M' \to M$ and $M' \to \tau (M)$ have kernel and cokernel in $\mathcal{C}$. Working backwards we conclude that $x = [A] - [A']$ is in the image of $K_0(\mathcal{C}) \to K_0(\mathcal{A})$ and the proof of part (1) is complete.

Proof of (2). The proof is similar to the proof of (1) but slightly more bookkeeping is involved. First we remark that any class of the type $[H^0(M, \varphi , \psi )] - [H^1(M, \varphi , \psi )]$ is zero in $K_0(\mathcal{A})$ by the following calculation

as desired. Hence it suffices to show that any element in the kernel of $K_0(\mathcal{C}) \to K_0(\mathcal{A})$ is of this form.

Any element $x$ in $K_0(\mathcal{C})$ can be represented as the difference $x = [P] - [Q]$ of two objects of $\mathcal{C}$ (fun exercise). Suppose that this element maps to zero in $K_0(\mathcal{A})$. This means that there exist

a finite set $I = I^{+} \amalg I^{-}$,

for $i \in I$ a short exact sequence $0 \to A_ i \to B_ i \to C_ i \to 0$ in $\mathcal{A}$

such that

in the free abelian group on the objects of $\mathcal{A}$. We can rewrite this as

Since the right and left hand side should contain the same objects of $\mathcal{A}$ counted with multiplicity, this means there should be a bijection $\tau $ between the terms which occur above. Set

and

Set $T = T^{+} \amalg T^{-} = \{ p, q\} \amalg \{ a, b, c\} \times I$. For $t \in T$ define

Hence we can view $\tau : T^{+} \to T^{-}$ as a bijection such that $O(t) = O(\tau (t))$ for all $t \in T^{+}$. Let $t^{-}_0 = \tau (p)$ and let $t^{+}_0 \in T^{+}$ be the unique element such that $\tau (t^{+}_0) = q$. Consider the object

By using $\tau $ we see that it is equal to the object

Consider the map

which on the summand $O(t) = A_ i$ corresponding to $t = (a, i)$, $i \in I^{+}$ uses the map $A_ i \to B_ i$ into the summand $O((b, i)) = B_ i$ of $M^{-}$ and on the summand $O(t) = B_ i$ corresponding to $(b, i)$, $i \in I^{-}$ uses the map $B_ i \to C_ i$ into the summand $O((c, i)) = C_ i$ of $M^{-}$. The map is zero on the summands corresponding to $p$ and $(c, i)$, $i \in I^{+}$. Similarly, consider the map

which on the summand $O(t) = A_ i$ corresponding to $t = (a, i)$, $i \in I^{-}$ uses the map $A_ i \to B_ i$ into the summand $O((b, i)) = B_ i$ of $M^{+}$ and on the summand $O(t) = B_ i$ corresponding to $(b, i)$, $i \in I^{+}$ uses the map $B_ i \to C_ i$ into the summand $O((c, i)) = C_ i$ of $M^{+}$. The map is zero on the summands corresponding to $q$ and $(c, i)$, $i \in I^{-}$.

Note that the kernel of $\varphi $ is equal to the direct sum of the summand $P$ and the summands $O((c, i)) = C_ i$, $i \in I^{+}$ and the subobjects $A_ i$ inside the summands $O((b, i)) = B_ i$, $i \in I^{-}$. The image of $\psi $ is equal to the direct sum of the summands $O((c, i)) = C_ i$, $i \in I^{+}$ and the subobjects $A_ i$ inside the summands $O((b, i)) = B_ i$, $i \in I^{-}$. In other words we see that

In exactly the same way we see that

Since as we remarked above the existence of the bijection $\tau $ shows that $M^{+} = M^{-}$ we see that the lemma follows. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)