Lemma 31.25.4. Let $X$ be a scheme. Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an invertible $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. In each of the following cases $\mathcal{L}$ has a regular meromorphic section:

1. $X$ is integral,

2. $X$ is reduced and any quasi-compact open has a finite number of irreducible components,

3. $X$ is locally Noetherian and has no embedded points.

Proof. In case (1) let $\eta \in X$ be the generic point. We have seen in Lemma 31.25.3 that $\mathcal{K}_ X$, resp. $\mathcal{K}_ X(\mathcal{L})$ is the constant sheaf with value $\kappa (\eta )$, resp. $\mathcal{L}_\eta$. Since $\dim _{\kappa (\eta )} \mathcal{L}_\eta = 1$ we can pick a nonzero element $s \in \mathcal{L}_\eta$. Clearly $s$ is a regular meromorphic section of $\mathcal{L}$. In case (2) pick $s_\eta \in \mathcal{L}_\eta$ nonzero for all generic points $\eta$ of $X$; this is possible as $\mathcal{L}_\eta$ is a $1$-dimensional vector space over $\kappa (\eta )$. It follows immediately from the description of $\mathcal{K}_ X$ and $\mathcal{K}_ X(\mathcal{L})$ in Lemma 31.25.1 that $s = \prod s_\eta$ is a regular meromorphic section of $\mathcal{L}$. Case (3) is Lemma 31.24.4. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 02OZ. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.