42.69.1 Rational equivalence and K-groups
This section is a continuation of Section 42.23. The motivation for the following lemma is Homology, Lemma 12.11.3.
Lemma 42.69.2. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X be a scheme locally of finite type over S. Let \mathcal{F} be a coherent sheaf on X. Let
\xymatrix{ \ldots \ar[r] & \mathcal{F} \ar[r]^\varphi & \mathcal{F} \ar[r]^\psi & \mathcal{F} \ar[r]^\varphi & \mathcal{F} \ar[r] & \ldots }
be a complex as in Homology, Equation (12.11.2.1). Assume that
\dim _\delta (\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F})) \leq k + 1.
\dim _\delta (\text{Supp}(H^ i(\mathcal{F}, \varphi , \psi ))) \leq k for i = 0, 1.
Then we have
[H^0(\mathcal{F}, \varphi , \psi )]_ k \sim _{rat} [H^1(\mathcal{F}, \varphi , \psi )]_ k
as k-cycles on X.
Proof.
Let \{ W_ j\} _{j \in J} be the collection of irreducible components of \text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}) which have \delta -dimension k + 1. Note that \{ W_ j\} is a locally finite collection of closed subsets of X by Lemma 42.10.1. For every j, let \xi _ j \in W_ j be the generic point. Set
f_ j = \det \nolimits _{\kappa (\xi _ j)} (\mathcal{F}_{\xi _ j}, \varphi _{\xi _ j}, \psi _{\xi _ j}) \in R(W_ j)^*.
See Definition 42.68.13 for notation. We claim that
- [H^0(\mathcal{F}, \varphi , \psi )]_ k + [H^1(\mathcal{F}, \varphi , \psi )]_ k = \sum (W_ j \to X)_*\text{div}(f_ j)
If we prove this then the lemma follows.
Let Z \subset X be an integral closed subscheme of \delta -dimension k. To prove the equality above it suffices to show that the coefficient n of [Z] in [H^0(\mathcal{F}, \varphi , \psi )]_ k - [H^1(\mathcal{F}, \varphi , \psi )]_ k is the same as the coefficient m of [Z] in \sum (W_ j \to X)_*\text{div}(f_ j) . Let \xi \in Z be the generic point. Consider the local ring A = \mathcal{O}_{X, \xi }. Let M = \mathcal{F}_\xi as an A-module. Denote \varphi , \psi : M \to M the action of \varphi , \psi on the stalk. By our choice of \xi \in Z we have \delta (\xi ) = k and hence \dim (\text{Supp}(M)) = 1. Finally, the integral closed subschemes W_ j passing through \xi correspond to the minimal primes \mathfrak q_ i of \text{Supp}(M). In each case the element f_ j \in R(W_ j)^* corresponds to the element \det _{\kappa (\mathfrak q_ i)}(M_{\mathfrak q_ i}, \varphi , \psi ) in \kappa (\mathfrak q_ i)^*. Hence we see that
n = - e_ A(M, \varphi , \psi )
and
m = \sum \text{ord}_{A/\mathfrak q_ i} (\det \nolimits _{\kappa (\mathfrak q_ i)}(M_{\mathfrak q_ i}, \varphi , \psi ))
Thus the result follows from Proposition 42.68.43.
\square
Lemma 42.69.3. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X be a scheme locally of finite type over S. The map
\mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _ k(X) \longrightarrow K_0(\textit{Coh}_{\leq k + 1}(X)/\textit{Coh}_{\leq k - 1}(X))
from Lemma 42.23.4 induces a bijection from \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _ k(X) onto the image B_ k(X) of the map
K_0(\textit{Coh}_{\leq k}(X)/\textit{Coh}_{\leq k - 1}(X)) \longrightarrow K_0(\textit{Coh}_{\leq k + 1}(X)/\textit{Coh}_{\leq k - 1}(X)).
Proof.
By Lemma 42.23.2 we have Z_ k(X) = K_0(\textit{Coh}_{\leq k}(X)/\textit{Coh}_{\leq k - 1}(X)) compatible with the map of Lemma 42.23.4. Thus, suppose we have an element [A] - [B] of K_0(\textit{Coh}_{\leq k}(X)/\textit{Coh}_{\leq k - 1}(X)) which maps to zero in B_ k(X), i.e., maps to zero in K_0(\textit{Coh}_{\leq k + 1}(X)/\textit{Coh}_{\leq k - 1}(X)). We have to show that [A] - [B] corresponds to a cycle rationally equivalent to zero on X. Suppose [A] = [\mathcal{A}] and [B] = [\mathcal{B}] for some coherent sheaves \mathcal{A}, \mathcal{B} on X supported in \delta -dimension \leq k. The assumption that [A] - [B] maps to zero in the group K_0(\textit{Coh}_{\leq k + 1}(X)/\textit{Coh}_{\leq k - 1}(X)) means that there exists coherent sheaves \mathcal{A}', \mathcal{B}' on X supported in \delta -dimension \leq k - 1 such that [\mathcal{A} \oplus \mathcal{A}'] - [\mathcal{B} \oplus \mathcal{B}'] is zero in K_0(\textit{Coh}_{k + 1}(X)) (use part (1) of Homology, Lemma 12.11.3). By part (2) of Homology, Lemma 12.11.3 this means there exists a (2, 1)-periodic complex (\mathcal{F}, \varphi , \psi ) in the category \textit{Coh}_{\leq k + 1}(X) such that \mathcal{A} \oplus \mathcal{A}' = H^0(\mathcal{F}, \varphi , \psi ) and \mathcal{B} \oplus \mathcal{B}' = H^1(\mathcal{F}, \varphi , \psi ). By Lemma 42.69.2 this implies that
[\mathcal{A} \oplus \mathcal{A}']_ k \sim _{rat} [\mathcal{B} \oplus \mathcal{B}']_ k
This proves that [A] - [B] maps to a cycle rationally equivalent to zero by the map
K_0(\textit{Coh}_{\leq k}(X)/\textit{Coh}_{\leq k - 1}(X)) \longrightarrow Z_ k(X)
of Lemma 42.23.2. This is what we had to prove and the proof is complete.
\square
Comments (0)