Lemma 39.22.2. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $(U, R, s, t, c)$ be a groupoid over $S$. Let $G \to U$ be the stabilizer group scheme.

1. The following are equivalent

1. $j : R \to U \times _ S U$ is separated,

2. $G \to U$ is separated, and

3. $e : U \to G$ is a closed immersion.

2. The following are equivalent

1. $j : R \to U \times _ S U$ is quasi-separated,

2. $G \to U$ is quasi-separated, and

3. $e : U \to G$ is quasi-compact.

Proof. The group scheme $G \to U$ is the base change of $R \to U \times _ S U$ by the diagonal morphism $U \to U \times _ S U$, see Lemma 39.17.1. Hence if $j$ is separated (resp. quasi-separated), then $G \to U$ is separated (resp. quasi-separated). (See Schemes, Lemma 26.21.12). Thus (a) $\Rightarrow$ (b) in both (1) and (2).

If $G \to U$ is separated (resp. quasi-separated), then the morphism $U \to G$, as a section of the structure morphism $G \to U$ is a closed immersion (resp. quasi-compact), see Schemes, Lemma 26.21.11. Thus (b) $\Rightarrow$ (a) in both (1) and (2).

By the result of Lemma 39.22.1 (and Schemes, Lemmas 26.18.2 and 26.19.3) we see that if $e$ is a closed immersion (resp. quasi-compact) $\Delta _{R/U \times _ S U}$ is a closed immersion (resp. quasi-compact). Thus (c) $\Rightarrow$ (a) in both (1) and (2). $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 02YI. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.