The Stacks project

Remark 64.5.2. Consider the property $\mathcal{P}=$“surjective”. In this case there could be some ambiguity if we say “let $F \to G$ be a surjective map”. Namely, we could mean the notion defined in Definition 64.5.1 above, or we could mean a surjective map of presheaves, see Sites, Definition 7.3.1, or, if both $F$ and $G$ are sheaves, we could mean a surjective map of sheaves, see Sites, Definition 7.11.1. If not mentioned otherwise when discussing morphisms of algebraic spaces we will always mean the first. See Lemma 64.5.9 for a case where surjectivity implies surjectivity as a map of sheaves.

Comments (2)

Comment #6839 by Matthieu Romagny on

Comma after "Definition 7.11.1" should be a full stop.

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 02YN. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.