The Stacks project

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

Lemma 10.47.1. Let $k$ be a separably algebraically closed field. Let $R$, $S$ be $k$-algebras. If $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$, and $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S)$ are connected, then so is $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R \otimes _ k S)$.

Proof. Recall that $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ is connected if and only if $R$ has no nontrivial idempotents, see Lemma 10.20.4. Hence, by Lemma 10.42.4 we may assume $R$ and $S$ are of finite type over $k$. In this case $R$ and $S$ are Noetherian, and have finitely many minimal primes, see Lemma 10.30.6. Thus we may argue by induction on $n + m$ where $n$, resp. $m$ is the number of irreducible components of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$, resp. $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S)$. Of course the case where either $n$ or $m$ is zero is trivial. If $n = m = 1$, i.e., $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ and $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S)$ both have one irreducible component, then the result holds by Lemma 10.46.2. Suppose that $n > 1$. Let $\mathfrak p \subset R$ be a minimal prime corresponding to the irreducible closed subset $T \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$. Let $I \subset R$ be such that $T' = V(I) \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ is the closure of the complement of $T$. Note that this means that $T' = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R/I)$ (Lemma 10.16.7) has $n - 1$ irreducible components. Then $T \cup T' = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$, and $T \cap T' = V(\mathfrak p + I) = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R/(\mathfrak p + I))$ is not empty as $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ is assumed connected. The inverse image of $T$ in $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R \otimes _ k S)$ is $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R/\mathfrak p \otimes _ k S)$, and the inverse of $T'$ in $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R \otimes _ k S)$ is $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R/I \otimes _ k S)$. By induction these are both connected. The inverse image of $T \cap T'$ is $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R/(\mathfrak p + I) \otimes _ k S)$ which is nonempty. Hence $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R \otimes _ k S)$ is connected. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 037R. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.