Proof.
Assume u satisfies properties (1) – (5). We will show that the adjunction mappings
\mathcal{G} \longrightarrow g_*g^{-1}\mathcal{G} \quad \text{and}\quad g^{-1}g_*\mathcal{F} \longrightarrow \mathcal{F}
are isomorphisms.
Note that Lemma 7.21.5 applies and we have g^{-1}\mathcal{G}(U) = \mathcal{G}(u(U)) for any sheaf \mathcal{G} on \mathcal{D}. Next, let \mathcal{F} be a sheaf on \mathcal{C}, and let V be an object of \mathcal{D}. By definition we have g_*\mathcal{F}(V) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{u(U) \to V} \mathcal{F}(U). Hence
g^{-1}g_*\mathcal{F}(U) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{U', u(U') \to u(U)} \mathcal{F}(U')
where the morphisms \psi : u(U') \to u(U) need not be of the form u(\alpha ). The category of such pairs (U', \psi ) has a final object, namely (U, \text{id}), which gives rise to the map from the limit into \mathcal{F}(U). Let (s_{(U', \psi )}) be an element of the limit. We want to show that s_{(U', \psi )} is uniquely determined by the value s_{(U, \text{id})} \in \mathcal{F}(U). By property (4) given any (U', \psi ) there exists a covering \{ U'_ i \to U'\} such that the compositions u(U'_ i) \to u(U') \to u(U) are of the form u(c_ i) for some c_ i : U'_ i \to U in \mathcal{C}. Hence
s_{(U', \psi )}|_{U'_ i} = c_ i^*(s_{(U, \text{id})}).
Since \mathcal{F} is a sheaf it follows that indeed s_{(U', \psi )} is determined by s_{(U, \text{id})}. This proves uniqueness. For existence, assume given any s \in \mathcal{F}(U), \psi : u(U') \to u(U), \{ f_ i : U_ i' \to U'\} and c_ i : U_ i' \to U such that \psi \circ u(f_ i) = u(c_ i) as above. We claim there exists a (unique) element s_{(U', \psi )} \in \mathcal{F}(U') such that
s_{(U', \psi )}|_{U'_ i} = c_ i^*(s).
Namely, a priori it is not clear the elements c_ i^*(s)|_{U_ i' \times _{U'} U_ j'} and c_ j^*(s)|_{U_ i' \times _{U'} U_ j'} agree, since the diagram
\xymatrix{ U_ i' \times _{U'} U_ j' \ar[r]_-{\text{pr}_2} \ar[d]_{\text{pr}_1} & U_ j' \ar[d]^{c_ j} \\ U_ i' \ar[r]^{c_ i} & U}
need not commute. But condition (3) of the lemma guarantees that there exist coverings \{ f_{ijk} : U'_{ijk} \to U_ i' \times _{U'} U_ j'\} _{k \in K_{ij}} such that c_ i \circ \text{pr}_1 \circ f_{ijk} = c_ j \circ \text{pr}_2 \circ f_{ijk}. Hence
f_{ijk}^* \left(c_ i^*s|_{U_ i' \times _{U'} U_ j'}\right) = f_{ijk}^* \left(c_ j^*s|_{U_ i' \times _{U'} U_ j'}\right)
Hence c_ i^*(s)|_{U_ i' \times _{U'} U_ j'} = c_ j^*(s)|_{U_ i' \times _{U'} U_ j'} by the sheaf condition for \mathcal{F} and hence the existence of s_{(U', \psi )} also by the sheaf condition for \mathcal{F}. The uniqueness guarantees that the collection (s_{(U', \psi )}) so obtained is an element of the limit with s_{(U, \psi )} = s. This proves that g^{-1}g_*\mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F} is an isomorphism.
Let \mathcal{G} be a sheaf on \mathcal{D}. Let V be an object of \mathcal{D}. Then we see that
g_*g^{-1}\mathcal{G}(V) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{U, \psi : u(U) \to V} \mathcal{G}(u(U))
By the preceding paragraph we see that the value of the sheaf g_*g^{-1}\mathcal{G} on an object V of the form V = u(U) is equal to \mathcal{G}(u(U)). (Formally, this holds because we have g^{-1}g_*g^{-1} \cong g^{-1}, and the description of g^{-1} given at the beginning of the proof; informally just by comparing limits here and above.) Hence the adjunction mapping \mathcal{G} \to g_*g^{-1}\mathcal{G} has the property that it is a bijection on sections over any object of the form u(U). Since by axiom (5) there exists a covering of V by objects of the form u(U) we see easily that the adjunction map is an isomorphism.
\square
Comments (0)
There are also: