Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/autoload/mtable.js

The Stacks project

Example 59.15.7. Consider the presheaf

\begin{matrix} \mathcal{F} : & (\mathit{Sch}/S)^{opp} & \longrightarrow & \textit{Ab} \\ & T/S & \longmapsto & \Gamma (T, \Omega _{T/S}). \end{matrix}

The compatibility of differentials with localization implies that \mathcal{F} is a sheaf on the Zariski site. However, it does not satisfy the sheaf condition for the fpqc topology. Namely, consider the case S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{F}_ p) and the morphism

\varphi : V = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{F}_ p[v]) \to U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{F}_ p[u])

given by mapping u to v^ p. The family \{ \varphi \} is an fpqc covering, yet the restriction mapping \mathcal{F}(U) \to \mathcal{F}(V) sends the generator \text{d}u to \text{d}(v^ p) = 0, so it is the zero map, and the diagram

\xymatrix{ \mathcal{F}(U) \ar[r]^{0} & \mathcal{F}(V) \ar@<1ex>[r] \ar@<-1ex>[r] & \mathcal{F}(V \times _ U V) }

is not an equalizer. We will see later that \mathcal{F} does in fact give rise to a sheaf on the étale and smooth sites.


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 4 comment(s) on Section 59.15: The fpqc topology

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.